The timelines of the three main characters in the junior high school are different from each other. As the plot unfolds, the "destiny" is gradually intertwined in the same time and space, until the "father and daughter" meet at the end of the play.
I understand that the script of the first season is mainly adapted from the short story collection of the novel. I don’t know if it is because of this reason that the adaptation is not solid enough, and the introduction of the overall world view is too rough, making the audience unable to grasp the main points of the series. Contradictions, between different races or between the same race, between different factions of the Brotherhood, or about fate, greatly weaken the logic of the characters' behavior.
Of course, it can be seen that the main length and purpose of this season's series is to portray the characters, especially the "parents and daughters", but this task is still not good enough. I personally think that the best portrayal of the three is Yennefer. The role of Ciri has just begun when life is undergoing a huge change. Geralt’s role is not about personal growth, but more about letting the audience understand him through the character’s experience and at the same time play a role in the field. At least Yennefer’s role has the psychological growth of the character. Curved, but very unobvious. Then, the expansion of the aforementioned world view and the growth of the main characters (mainly Ciri) are waiting for the subsequent seasons to start, resulting in the whole season of this season being like a trailer, but the time cost of using the whole season as a trailer is too high, so Non-fiction readers or non-game players feel very unfriendly.
Everything is for the second season.
View more about The Witcher reviews
