Not sure why this is considered a classic? Is it because there are too few vampire movies? Pick a general among the dwarfs? Or is it because in 1992 such a production was already considered superior? The picture is sluggish, dirty, and false. I really insisted on watching it. I have seen so many high-quality film reviews before, but "Four Hundred Years of Fright" is too inferior in comparison.
The performance of Keanu Reeves in the film can only be described as "sluggish". The only person who caught my eye was the heroine, Winona Ryder. Before, I didn't know there was such a peerless beauty. Her beauty is what I admire: it can be very feminine or very candid. Whether she has short or long hair, she always has a different style of beauty. Spiritual feeling. This reminds me of Ouyang Jing in Hong Kong. I think they are a bit similar, both in looks and temperament.
The only thing I felt about the whole movie was that Winona was really beautiful and nothing else.
View more about Dracula reviews
