But no matter how abused it is, people are still obsessed with it.
Because this beautiful word is too gripping and makes people unable to control themselves.
Shakespeare should be a romantic person, a tragic person, we always speculate like this in future generations.
But maybe, Shakespeare is just a down-to-earth man who loves fantasies. He does not have the image of corrupt and indulgence in the Middle Ages. Instead, he is a Mr. Miyoshi who takes care of the family in an orderly manner.
What is Shakespeare like?
The most satisfying answer for people is that he has a legendary life, a handsome appearance, and then a few times of vigorous and missing love.
Missing love?
Love, a seemingly perfect term, must contain the saddest regrets in order to shine.
Turning a small passion into a small life is naturally tempting without the ups and downs. But if the small passion is turned into a big sacrifice, then the strong tragic complex can capture all the officials in front of the screen. The watchers all want their lives to be safe and healthy, to love each other, but they still want to see sensational pictures. Just like the beggar child in the film, his favorite scene is the bloody fight scene, and when the conflict erupts, it has an inexplicable attraction.
Men are inspired by women.
And Viola came to the image of Shakespeare's life indeed - Mr. Keith. The screenwriter definitely supports the historical statement that Shakespeare is gay, but because of the fact that the folk customs in 1998 are not as open as they are today, women disguise themselves as men to cover up the real gay complex. So is the love of the general. So, can we relax a little bit more about the sources of inspiration: Men are sometimes inspired by women, sometimes by men? There are many scenes in the film where Shakespeare kisses and hugs Miss Viola dressed in men's clothing. It really makes people complain. Since Miss Viola's men's clothing deceived Shakespeare at the beginning, why did she expose Shakespeare's children's shoes? How about unscrupulously kissing a woman who looks just like a man? Then there is the fact that British theaters did not allow women to appear on the stage, so every play with female characters is actually a male and male drama, OMG, the Middle Ages is the most corrupt era! What is the current rot, rotten women and rotten men! Go ahead! Travel back to the Middle Ages! Enjoy watching people chewing their mouths full of London-Italian-French stuff!
Personally, due to the need for professionalism, I pay more attention to the quality of the film's production. I have to admit that the quality of movies before the millennium was much higher than that after the millennium. At that time, there was no mature 3D technology, and there were not so many post-production special effects and computerized operations, so people who made movies would really pay attention. Every detail, whether it is Queen Elizabeth's makeup and the collar with gold flashing diamonds on her dress, or the swaying river and the flickering lights, the switching and succession of the shots are also more delicate, which is restored to the drama. The film is serious and pure. I am not against the advancement of technology, but I am against the advancement of technology that reduces people's focus on beauty. It is better to find good actors and good props and backgrounds for large scenes and large productions in 3D high-definition. The most attention in the movie should be the script, and then the acting skills of the actors.
I do pay close attention to the film-making process, but I really don’t want the screen colors to become more and more high-definition, while people’s eyes are less and less able to discover and create beauty.
This is also true when it comes to love.
View more about Shakespeare in Love reviews
