The film is not in line with today's outlook on life and morality. It is a family ethics film with a magnificent American western landscape and a top-notch symphony soundtrack. Those who recognize it are nothing more than incited by these two elements. I am a shooter who loves freedom very much, but I don’t agree with the so-called freedom that the protagonist is chasing. Some people say that the protagonist’s exile is self-exile. , and it itself is not necessarily an act worthy of praise, it is nothing more than a beautiful picture of a group of people who yearn for freedom but are full of thorns. This kind of behavior should be considered at the same high point as the moral level! Like the protagonist in the film who ran away three times, the first time was the death of his younger brother after the war. It is understandable that he could not calm down and go out for a walk. However, she betrayed her faith in the middle. Although her wife unfortunately passed away, she has raised children after all, but she still chooses to let loose for her own selfish interests. I don't understand this. How can this kind of self-imposed exile under the bondage of family affection and morality show nobility? poor old Pap loves his second son deeply but has been "left behind" by him countless times. . It's powerless to say that he loves the heroine. From the time he returned from wandering to learn that the heroine was married to his brother, to visiting the heroine, and finally to knowing that the heroine committed suicide, he gave the same expression from beginning to end. . . It doesn't matter. Combining his deeds, selfish, arrogant, irresponsible, irresponsible. He is the kind of person who puts himself first. It's hard to imagine why Indian Yidao brother can use the protagonist's life to sing praises, borrowing a short comment on a certain gentleman "also euphemistically called "listen to your inner voice", but it is selfish Just confused again~" The only unreliable character in the film is also the male protagonist. Let's first look at other people. The old father is calm and calm. The good father who is the first in the family, the elder brother is mature, wise and smart, but he is always pitiful emotionally. Man, the younger brother is tender, kind, brave, and tragic man who uses his blood in the wrong place. . Mistress. . Bo Ai, of course, what she loves most is the male protagonist. Even though she is married to the older brother of the man she loves, she is always ready to turn back for the male protagonist. . What a bitch with a dog. . A group of people knelt down and licked to help her build a chastity archway after reading it, which is really morally corrupt. Having said that, everyone's character creation is very impressive, except for the second son, the protagonist, a man with bear blood flowing on his body. Except for freedom, there seems to be no more positive energy in him. His exile behavior is illusory. , there is absolutely no principle to say that the best film I have seen from the director is "Blood Diamond". It is recommended with full marks. The image of the protagonist created by Leonardo in the blood diamond is extremely noble, but upon closer inspection, it is actually similar to the character of the male lead in this film. It is quite similar, bohemian, free and unrestrained, accumulating money, making black money, but why are the roles so different in the end? First of all, Leonardo in Blood Diamond has the same bohemian character charm as the hero of this film, which captures a large number of girls' hearts, until his death at the end of the film directly sublimated the character image to the extreme. . This is also the personal sublimation that the film lacks. In addition, the most important thing mentioned above is the issue of morality. Leonardo in "Blood Diamond" has no family background, so all his actions are paid for by himself, which is largely in line with the background of the film's family morality and ethics. This is what I said earlier: "The expression of self-imposed exile is usually without family affection, otherwise this behavior should be considered on the same level as the moral level!" The main character has the same bohemian charm and captured the hearts of a large number of girls, until his death at the end of the film directly sublimated the character image to the extreme. . This is also the personal sublimation that the film lacks. In addition, the most important thing mentioned above is the issue of morality. Leonardo in "Blood Diamond" has no family background, so all his actions are paid for by himself, which is largely in line with the background of the film's family morality and ethics. This is what I said earlier: "The expression of self-imposed exile is usually without family affection, otherwise this behavior should be considered on the same level as the moral level!" The main character has the same bohemian charm and captured the hearts of a large number of girls, until his death at the end of the film directly sublimated the character image to the extreme. . This is also the personal sublimation that the film lacks. In addition, the most important thing mentioned above is the issue of morality. Leonardo in "Blood Diamond" has no family background, so all his actions are paid for by himself, which is largely in line with the background of the film's family morality and ethics. This is what I said earlier: "The expression of self-imposed exile is usually without family affection, otherwise this behavior should be considered on the same level as the moral level!"
View more about Legends of the Fall reviews
