Why do I watch such a stupid movie

Theresa 2022-03-17 09:01:10

I haven't seen such a stupid movie in a long time.
For movies, I can only give stars. However, considering the difficult conditions of filming, one star is for hard work and one star is for action design.

Alright, let's talk about movies. Go see it with friends, don't ask me why I want to see it. Friend, a girl who fell in love with surging through "Real Boys". I, a friend who saw the director of "Mr. My" and chose to believe her.
What we got was that she persisted for ten minutes and had to play with her mobile phone. I persisted to the end through tenacious perseverance. The period was filled with certain curses and uncertain confusion, and I had to continue Gauguin's thinking, where do we come from? Come? who are we? Where are we going? Why am I sitting here?
Do you want to watch the clip that drags you to the point of falling asleep, or the symbolic character design, or the laughs when the Qing Dynasty was still alive?
why?
It has been more than ten years since "Raise Your Hands", and I have never seen such a stupid Japanese soldier again. I wish they were all mentally retarded. But "Hands Up" at least has a clear positioning and is indeed funny. "Flying Tigers on the Railway" made me begin to doubt life, where to dig potatoes.
Bean friends, who the fuck can tell me, is the screenwriter Martell Ruoxi, who came from across the country?

And I suspect that he is not Martel Ruoxi, otherwise he will not survive an episode with the screenwriter's IQ. Who can tell me, Mingming Wang Continent can hide with Big Brother Jackie Chan as soon as he turns over. He forced him for so long, which means I can't hide anyway. Brother lying on the grass, you forced him to run away.
More fortunately, such illogical plots fill the whole book.
Remember the screenwriter's name, Martel is retarded.

Speaking of the characters, I'm sorry, I can't tell you this. Except for Jackie Chan, there is still a portrayal (of course it's a failure, very symbolic setting, no human nature) Wang Kai still has an explanation, Mr. Xu Fan Abruptly relied on his own acting skills to carve out a slightly three-dimensional character image, and the others were all trash abandoned by the screenwriter and director. You can say that Huang Zitao is Fang Zu's name, you can also say that Fang Zu's name is Xiaohu, you can say that anyone is anyone or even Xing'er, anyway, there is no difference, they are all props.
I almost doubt that the character Wang Qianyuan in "Mr. My" was created by God.

And, why use 3D for this kind of movie? Can anyone answer me. Where is the value. Solve.

No longer.
Writing all this is a waste of my instant noodles time.
Needless to say, my time is very valuable. So are yours, so—thousands! ten thousand! No! want! go with! Look! One of your friends, I give you the strongest advice.

I don't like comedy, but the anti-Japanese war is quite good. day.

View more about Railroad Tigers reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ivory 2022-03-27 09:01:21

    It takes so much trouble to blow up the bridge, a note7 is not enough.

  • Queenie 2022-03-26 09:01:14

    5 points. It's not as bad as I imagined. An action comedy under the theme of anti-Japanese has weakened or basically eliminated the cruel things in the war, so it has nothing to do with reflection. It has become a pure visual and pure talk. The quirky little stories on the Internet are a kind of rich and detailed jokes that are constantly exaggerated by word of mouth. The film has always tried to use "anti-routines" to create laughs in paragraphs, but it is still an old routine as a whole.