The wonderful thing about this movie is that it throws out a few ultimate propositions in the first half. Although there is no good solution in the second half, who can make it clear: 1. If you are separated from everything you are familiar with , Including people, but giving you sufficient material guarantee for survival, including all kinds of entertainment that you are familiar with brought by high-tech, can you survive? Europeans should have considered more cruel problems than this in the great nautical era. The resulting novels, such as Robinson Crusoe, and the movie Survival on the Deserted Island, have hope in their hearts and believe that theoretically there is a problem. The other sailing ships discovered the rescued situation, so they were able to survive with nothing. In comparison, the biological survival pressure we face in the movie "Space Traveler" is zero. It's just that he is desperate. He can't count the days to live a life without uncertainties. After trying all the possibilities and unable to rule out the insurmountable difficulties brought by time and technology, he found that the possibility of meeting his companions was zero. This is the reason for his collapse. Even if it is for self-entertainment with modern equipment, this cannot replace the uncertainty caused by his companions, and can only delay the time of his collapse. In fact, I believe that he is able to achieve a biologically alive state and continue to natural death. It’s just that those necessary survival skills in human society will degenerate and disappear. Under such a worry-free environment, his survival will not be threatened or pressured. Eventually his brain will also degenerate and become a person who only eats and drinks. Lazard sleeping vegetative. In despair, perhaps the only desire is death. 2. Is it forgivable to wake someone up in despair? From his personal point of view and from the point of view of anyone except him, completely different answers can be drawn. Even in his own heart, he was tortured by the so-called "do not do to others" in the social morality and ethics, although in the end he succumbed to the selfish nature of human nature. Assume the following, if I were the male protagonist, I would choose to lie to the female protagonist for a lifetime, keep this secret forever without any external force, and may choose to have a bunch of children, but I would most likely be guilty of my guilt It caused me to insist on telling the truth before I die. Sometimes facts are facts, especially for the unchangeable reality and the past. We can only accept it and strive to create a better future. The hysteria when a woman knows the truth turns from love to hate, but she can't hold that stick. Is it also the softest space in human nature? Forgiveness is only a difference of subjective thoughts. This is a false proposition and it is difficult to form a consensus. The key is whether to forgive or not to forgive can realize the good wishes of the future. 3. Why hasn't this man's guilt feeling come to torture him for a long time? After a year of loneliness, perhaps the selfish part of this person’s human nature has already occupied the majority, and even after the conscience has been condemned but finally chose to wake up, he completely declared the defeat of his conscience and was deeply accumulated in the corner. In, no longer mentioned. After desperate, the man was quietly flirting and making love with the woman, even thinking about realizing the marriage proposal in modern society and fulfilling this secular wish. From here, I can see how everything in the world affects and drives people's various behaviors and goals. Will he be content like this? Do movies believe that family is the ultimate destination for people? The movie also feels that the challenge of two people who love each other facing survival together can better pierce the beautiful fantasy of most people. 4. The hostess forgave him after seeing the heroic side of the man, but why didn't she choose to turn this experience into a beautiful and exciting memory and still move towards the future? The selfish side of human nature is severely left aside here again. The hostess seems to be suffering from Stockholm syndrome, and she has an unavoidable sense of dependence on the man who ruined her future and deceived her feelings and body. It can be seen from the fact that the stick was not hit. I think before I met the deckmaster, how entangled and helpless the hostess was, she kept asking herself why she didn’t kill the person in front of her for revenge, because that would be of no avail, and she had nothing to achieve what she wanted to achieve in the future. help. Compared with the long and short lives of the deck, our two heroes and heroines realize that there is a huge test of living conditions in the biological sense. This motivated them to overcome their fighting spirit, which originated from the invincible magic weapon that we humans have continued for thousands of years in the struggle against nature, such as self-sacrifice, heroism, wisdom and determination in emergencies, and mutual cooperation between people regardless of previous suspicion, etc. It is written in our genes. In a world where there are only two people, both men and women have no other desires, so there is no left behind. If a third person with conflict of interest joins, it is estimated that it will become a lot more complicated, and we will be unwilling. See the ending of the bad guys plundering the good guys. When other spiritual desires cannot be satisfied at all, men are willing to seize this great cause of saving five thousand lives and make the greatest sacrifice. In addition to life and love for the heroine, they can also make up for women by the way. Of guilt. The nature of women’s human nature that is easily attracted by male heroism is stimulated, and they are not far behind. They do everything to save the protagonist, and even choose to actively give up the opportunity to go to the future, just to maintain the relationship between the two, it is right. A heroic way of expressing admiration for men. The point of view of the movie is that love can replace everything in human society, and people can spend their entire lives in the beautiful love constructed by both men and women. Allow me to be evil again. From the perspective of selfishness, the hero in the movie can also have the following options: 1. The heroine chooses to lie in the medical rescue cabin to return to the future, provided that he uses the hero’s guilt to make him guarantee This can be achieved by not disturbing him from hibernation; 2. The easiest and rude way for a man to return to the future is to let the woman die, or weave a lie that will prevent the woman from waking him up, provided that the man can live through his heart This level; 3. The host and hostess wake up the captain, arbitrarily demand his responsibility, and pass the problem to a more professional person. Even if the risk is to bring another person into the water, it may also add a stakeholder. In case the captain also likes women. Where's the master? What if the captain wakes up more people, and ultimately still doesn't go back to the past? Enlightenment and harvest: The desire of human nature is an important driving force that drives people to live, and it is also an important fuel for the operation of this society; it seems that everything that people do when they are on the edge of society and no longer on the edge of survival can be understood and forgiven; There is no enduring love in this world, but the emotional side of people always believes that love can make people immortal and let people abandon everything. From this point of view, love is no different from poison, and it is addictive for a lifetime; where to live is a lifetime, it is best to be in a dynamic balance, free from excessive inner desires and uncontrollable variables of the external environment Influence, enjoy all kinds of life pleasures as much as possible.
View more about Passengers reviews
