Caesar's trilogy, I arrive, I see, I win.
The teacher of foreign news history commented on the American drama in class, criticizing it for pulling Caesar down from the altar and being too verbose. So I'll take a look.
It may be that I don’t know much about this history, and I don’t have a too specific image of Caesar to rely on, so I don’t find it difficult to accept. The two lines of the little man and the big man are parallel and cross.
To be honest, the ending of the first movie was quite uncomfortable. Both of them (Caesar and Naoby) died of mental retardation. Maybe this mental retardation is a way for the screenwriter to express helplessness. It's not a documentary, it's just a historical story, but it tries to show a lot of things from that era and it does it successfully: obscenity, cruelty, ignorance, heroism and so-called democracy. This show is trying its best to magnify the little people and women, in order to show the artificiality and non-accidental nature of history. But I always feel that this magnification is a bit derogatory (of course it can also be said to be ironic), just like Seville doesn't know and doesn't care what a whistleblower means to a small family, to the whole of Rome. what.
Finally, I want to say that it is true that the press officer is very cute.
This little finger I laughed out loud?
View more about Rome reviews
