This film review does not discuss the plot, if you want to see the plot-related turn left, don't say I didn't tell you.
It's really not worth writing a review for this kind of film, it's mainly for scoring. Although my strength is meager, I must give the lowest score, lower the average score of this film, and point out the stench of its connotations, so that people who are brainwashed because they do not understand it can see it, so as to prove the IQ and vision of the people. There is still salvation. Even if hope may be locked at the bottom of the box, let me insist on being a minority at the bottom of the box. This is the only way for scholars to save the world.
I'm not talking about the obvious superficial problems of a lack of plot, loopholes in logic, messy camera narratives, weak characterizations, music for music's sake and nostalgic branding that doesn't quite compare to last century's black-and-white classics and Broadway musicals. In the face of the overall distorted conception, these are all light. If there is no conception problem, this film can still be regarded as an unsatisfactory light-hearted musical. But with such a distorted intention, it is not an exaggeration to enter the eighteenth hell. I hate the unscrupulous media that have the right to speak but don't preach and dispel doubts and instill wrong ideas on the public.
Just talking about the idea, I have never seen such a heartless whitewashing. A variety show trumpets the emperor's exploits of Emperor Qin and Qianlong. Compared with this film, they all lose. These shows have made a mistake I hate the most: living the past with the present. Without understanding or deliberately covering up the facts, the values of today are forcibly applied to past events, and even the black and white of history are reversed. If the values of justice are installed, that's all, but this film is not. What is the whitewashing of despicable villains and black-hearted industries?
The modern circus in the United States is not the beautiful fantasy paradise in the eyes of modern people. In comparison, "American Horror Story. Freak Show" is a work of conscience, and the darkness played in it is closer to the truth. Even "Black Butler. Circus" is more dare to speak and act than this film. The fact is that capitalists who are unscrupulous for profit, collect deformed, sick, peculiar-looking members, and perform high-risk special skills, and show them for people to show, for people to point out, laugh at, admire, and satisfy people's darkest feelings. of curiosity. Exploitation, oppression, and even discipline are common, and many circus members are not born with disabilities, but are artificially disabled for the sake of performance. In short, all your ugly imaginations may not be able to restore the black history of this field, and it will not be much cleaner than the prostitutes of the old times. It's just a film review. In order not to cause discomfort to all kinds of pampered audiences who don't know the sufferings of the people, I won't list the specific textual research. If you really can't imagine, you can search the sociology books that describe the evils of capital by yourself. Cases, it is not exaggerated to impose them on the circus masters of the time, only more exaggerated.
Can you face the audience freely? Unbiased vision? On the contrary, the audience of the circus at that time came because of curiosity, like watching animals in a zoo.
It is obviously the most discriminatory environment, eating discrimination, drinking discrimination, making money from discrimination, and a career built on the blood, tears and bones of disabled artists, can it be written as a home for minority groups to fight for equality and non-discrimination? exm?
To borrow Lu Xun's words, even if I "are not afraid to speculate on a film with the worst malice, I still do not expect or believe that it will be so wicked and cruel."
This is really over my limit. As a scholar who is familiar with history, this is absolutely intolerable, like whitewashing ancient tyranny, whitewashing modern colonization, whitewashing aggression, and whitewashing slaughter.
This one is enough for zero points. Nothing else is needed. Thinking of this, how can you listen to music for entertainment?
I ask myself that I have a traditional intellectual style. I believe that the text is used to convey the truth, and the drama is to transform people. The theme is more important than the content, and the joke must have a degree. What kind of impact can such a film bring to the world?
When it comes to musicals, one of my favorite movies: The Dancer in the Dark, I think it's the best musical because it's not only a musical, but it also satirizes (most) music The silly white-sweet routines of the play really reveal that (like this film) behind the stage of whitewashing peace is actually the tragedy of cannibalism in reality.
I declare that I have no opinion on minority groups fighting for equal rights. What I object to is that the three views and approaches of this film are too crooked, trying to use the popularity of the theme of equality, but obviously drawing tigers is not an anti-dog, it will only encourage extreme thoughts , causing disgust and intensifying contradictions, do minority groups really need pig teammates?
The term ZZ correct has been derogatory and ironic since it was invented. It describes remarks and behaviors that excessively cater to the needs of ZZ and favor certain group values regardless of other objective facts. I don't know when the ZZ correct became the fashion in the literary and art circles. There is an indisputable fact in literary and artistic creation: ZZ is too correct, and other aspects are easily incorrect. Personally, I think that all imperial literature and art are destined to be rubbish.
This film is such an American model drama that is incorrect in history, knowledge, literature, art, morality, human nature and other aspects.
Humans are neither angels nor devils, but the more they try to embellish themselves as angels, the more they look like devils - this is a famous philosophical saying by Pascal. The more you try to be correct, the more completely incorrect.
America has a habit of exalting characters who, in my opinion, are anything but positive, from Rhett Butler, to Gatsby, and the protagonist of this film. why? Because it relies on such characters to establish its country, it is not ashamed, but proud. What kind of representative person there is, what kind of country there is, it is true. What's interesting is that the protagonist's image largely overlaps with that of America. This film is a living history of Uncle Tom's fortune. If you look at it as an irony, it is in place. He was a thief with dirty hands and feet when he was a child, and grew up to be a speculator who cheated and cheated. He used equality and freedom as a gimmick to make profits and cause disasters. After getting rich, he put on Chinese clothes and changed his face and started to brag about his love. He also develops a psychological barrier of both pride and inferiority, and he acts as a demon with aggression all day long.
I think that the old man is a bit harsh on his son-in-law, and it makes sense. The male protagonist used the results to prove that he is a successful upstart. No matter how rich he is, he can't get rid of his impetuous and impoverished temperament.
This film can be said to be counterproductive. It successfully stimulated my rebellious psychology. The cramming-style "he is injured, he is reasonable, he is anti-moral, but you must sympathize with him", not only did not win me a little empathy, but made me feel that such a person He deserves not to like anyone, his origin is not a problem, the problem is that he not only failed to overcome his origin, but also became a distorted character, a negative typical.
Sorry, I have always been educated to be a decent person with integrity and morality. I don't understand the mood of liars and robbers, and I don't want to know their unfortunate experiences and reasons. I refuse to use them as protagonists to sing works. Humans of these things are sick. Not very ill.
Look at this kind of movie, then connect with reality, and make a fuss about the reality of developed countries that "reduce punishment to protect the rights and interests of criminals / allow X-religion to invade in order to reflect human rights", is it scary? The atmosphere of entertainment and social atmosphere are consistent. No matter what kind of world style there is, there will be any kind of work, and literary and artistic works can also affect the world style in turn. If you can't see the fear of thinking carefully, you are too stupid.
I can only see the omen of the collapse of American culture. It is as old as the old saying, the good times have passed for a long time, and there are all kinds of evil spirits. If you don't put your family to death, you will be unhappy.
I hope that the lessons from the past, I will not learn. Seriously, I'd rather we make any stupid movie better than this. Problems in principle and defects in literature and art are not on the same level, the former is much more serious.
I once said that Americans should just shoot the brainless popcorn they are best at, just because they are afraid of thinking, and just thinking will reveal stupidity, especially the stupidity in the liberal arts is hopeless. Stupidity is also divided into categories. If it is cute stupidity, it is fine. The worst thing is that stupidity is always associated with evil. This film is an example.
A cartoon is better than this one, I recommend Coco more, Pixar's script is so good from content to artistic conception that I want to expel its American nationality to watch it alone~ (After all, the average level of American works has made me Despair) The theme of Coco is not something I like or agree with, but it is better than the content. No matter how small the cultural background is, it can be unpopular. It is not surprising. Although I dare not compare with Wall-E, it is better than Flying House. There are two plots. The second inversion is great, black is just right, black is vulgar in the end, and white is Disney in the end, you know. And Pixar's three views are simply the conscience of the industry, telling the next door that this is the correct way to open up the truth, goodness and beauty, the same is to play music, why is the gap so big?
The evil things that are difficult for normal people to face are packaged into the truth, the good and the beautiful, and they will eat human blood and steamed buns in front of the graves of the sad groups that cannot bear the history. I can not eat. This kind of film is the dish served by the fairy to Tang Seng. At first glance, it looks beautiful and delicious, and the eyes are full of rotten maggots. The poor foolish people are blind, but they eat it without fail. You're going to overturn it, and they still think it's delicious, blame you for not overturning it. Isn't Sun Wukong always stopped by Tang Seng when he catches monsters? It wouldn't be uncommon for a bunch of ignorant nonsense to entangle in my film review today, but because I'm Monkey King and they're Tang monks, they're used to it. The difference between cultured and uncultured is the difference between celestial eyes and naked eyes.
The problem with the PS film is the problem with the film, and I have no problem with the actors. It's a pity Uncle Wolf, he is still suitable for playing the tough guy who uses his muscles to fight to death with occasional tenderness.
****************At the end, there must be a preventive counterattack against some uneducated commenters******************* ****************
If you have different opinions, I may reply if you have a good opinion. If you have no rhetoric, you can just delete it. I don't intend to make everyone accept my point of view. Don't ask me to listen to you. I have the right to use film reviews in the public area, and the freedom of speech is balanced. Why do people who don't even understand the truth think that I'm not interested, don't tell me, delete it if you say it, I was very polite, if you ask me to be venomous, I will say it plainly, just please leave me mellow and don't disturb me, I'm not free . I don't need to make idiots find it useful, and I don't care if you find it useless. I don’t think it’s boring and can’t stop other people’s stupidity and boredom. Just do whatever you want. Just do it, work hard, and do your best. Let’s see if you can eliminate the existence of different opinions. Anyway, it’s not my life that was wasted. The more I can prove, the more I am different from you, and I am very pleased. Most of the mortals who can't see the goblin are Sun Wukong, which is good.
View more about The Greatest Showman reviews
