In one afternoon, I basically finished watching the whole drama in fast-forward. The setting can be said to be old-fashioned or novel. Group life in a confined space happens among classmates. Although some of them are mature, they follow Adult couples sleep together every night.
Seriously, if you want to survive in such an environment, you must have a leader, someone who can take charge, decide, and lead everyone. Such a role depends on either ability or identity. The elder sister is the former, the younger sister. It's the latter. I thought my sister was the protagonist, but I didn't expect that it was to pave the way for my sister. It was about two, three or four episodes before my sister died. I really sprayed old blood for her death. I thought that her death would indicate that the plot would go in the direction of people dying, but I didn't expect that she would stop after only one death, I really,,,, for the bus driver in the photo that has been paving the way in the play, look at it from the beginning He was always mentioned in the barrage when he was in the midst of his life. I don't know if these people watched the ending in advance or had foresight. I originally wanted to say that the bus driver was nothing, it didn't seem like a foreshadowing, but it turned out to be true, but this foreshadowing It was just at the end of the tenth episode, but the expression in the play meant that the whole incident was caused by him. I don't know if this is true, but it's not the sister he killed. If so, then The guy who was executed for that was an idiot.
Said that the person who was executed was an idiot, he was really an idiot, he looked like a madman during the whole incident, he thought to himself, "Although I didn't kill it, but even if I don't explain or justify, you judge that I killed it. , you won't treat me like that", so much so that when you finally realize that you might really die, you start to panic, why did you go earlier? I thought he was innocent at first, but throughout the whole process, he never defended himself. Is that gun his? He didn't say no. Did he kill people? He didn't say no. What was he doing that night? Is there an alibi? He didn't say it. Did he really admit directly to that tall, rich and handsome man that he killed him? What did he really say? He still didn't make it clear. Wait, wait, etc., in short, he didn't say a word that he didn't kill, and even admitted to killing in a pique, and even when he was about to be executed at the end, he still said "I was wrong", and It's not "I didn't kill." I made a mistake in these three words. In his opinion, it may be that he admits his own attitude towards things wrong, but in the eyes of others, he admits that he is wrong for murder. Do you think he should not die? From this, I concluded that he was really the murderer of my sister. The above is the conclusion I came to while watching the drama. If I think about it now, if he really killed him, then I should explain that he murdered. The reason for his murder, but now he has not said anything, and there is nothing that can explain why he murdered. He is not the point, and he has no friends and family around him, so it is up to others to explain his motive for murder. The situation is also unlikely, so he is probably really a scapegoat when considered comprehensively.
However, after talking about the above, I have to mention the final plot direction. The sister who finally sentenced him to death was expelled, but not because of the misjudgment of the sister, then I have to doubt my conclusion again, if she can always stand In the leadership position, then maybe there will be a reversal in the end, saying that he is not the murderer, they made a mistake in judgment, such a conflict is interesting, but she has been kicked out, unless she can seize power again, otherwise a downfall The bereaved dog, it shouldn't be interesting to see her being slapped in the face.
When it comes to my sister being taken away, I have to talk about the puppet duo, the rich second generation and the sitcom girl, these two people, the man is cowardly and the woman is aggressive, but neither of them know what to do, man The girl only knows to listen to her brother, and the girl only knows to oppose her sister. The two of them are quite compatible, but the sister's various regulations are actually not a problem in the general direction. I don't know what will happen under their leadership. Can you make a flower? Freedom in the United States is also established under various systems. They all understand the truth in reality. My sister has told everyone this truth from the beginning. I don’t know why some of them felt that they didn’t need it in such a closed environment. They can live well under the system. Has the screenwriter made them mentally retarded?
When it comes to the duo of puppets, I have to talk about the behind-the-scenes mastermind and the little sheep beside him. For this person, I think his great benefit is the cooperation of the women around him. Really, this woman, I'm full of sloths for her, but I don't want to say anything more, only the word "idiot" is given to her.
Finally, let's talk about the ending. It's really suspenseful, it's really reversed, and it really makes us puzzled, but I think it's the ending that the screenwriter insisted on taking the suspenseful route. American dramas always leave a doubt at the end for everyone to look forward to. One season, but this ending is really suspenseful for the sake of suspense. It has nothing to do with the previous plot, and nothing to do with it. This is also the usual way of American dramas, but there are several ways to express this kind of suspense. One is at the climax. Stop, one is a place where the climax has not yet reached the climax, but the climax is already foreseeable, and the other is the place where the climax is approaching but cannot be seen at all and does not know where the climax is. This drama is the third type, and it is wrong in the original. The story ended without causing people to guess that the climax was over, and then it just reversed, and it didn't whet people's appetite at all. It was really a nondescript and hasty ending.
At the end of the article, let’s take a look at the topic, although the drama may mention doctrine, life structure, people’s livelihood, democracy and dictatorship, etc. These are points of interest, but the rubbish in the plot is not enough Presenting these, or not enough to make people ignore the garbage plot to feel those things.
View more about The Society reviews
