We know that the eagle is the protagonist of this series of CG trailers, but when a movie takes you for the third time with an eagle overlooking the scenery from the perspective of God, you will vaguely know that it may be a part of time or trying to arouse your feelings of the player. The result was a rotten movie that was overkilled.
And when the movie appeared with serious lines such as "I'm hungry", "You're hungry", and "I'm hungry" within five minutes, you can already be sure that it is a bad film.
I know that the experience of passersby must be terrible. They watched a SB story that is comparable to Japanese comics in S2 and is full of incredible (derogatory) SB plots (the Assassins and Templars have struggled for the artifact Apple of Eden for thousands of years, this is also embarrassing to say), combined with the unique Hollywood "You don't understand the principle" black technology, an ancestor of the offspring of a stalker who jumps scare all day long, a murderous male protagonist who instantly believes in pyramid schemes by climbing up walls and fighting with his ancestors, a female protagonist with split personality, A group of pretenders who are tall but have zero combat power, Omar, and the little Nadal who has a strong sense of existence but really has no role. "What the hell did I watch? What does this movie want to show?" It may be the question they wondered after they walked out of the theater. The most mystery is probably "Just like this, there are so many people playing games, what do they like?"
Players and you are equally head-to-head. In fact, in the history of game adaptation movies, the original party and passers-by often have the same hatred and hatred. The former is often more sincere, pounding, heart-piercing, and using all the strength to shout out-why don't the screenwriters play games!
"The pleasure of seeing an acquaintance of Warcraft players" is a luxurious experience for Assassin players. Not only is there no one acquaintance in the whole film, but we started a series of panic inner screams almost from the moment we cut our fingers. ——Cut a P's finger. Whose second-hand science did the screenwriter believe in! My goodness, acting like this as soon as he came up would really not give people the wrong impression of a cult! Is the modern protagonist a murderer? ! Do you think it makes sense to kill the pimp! Isn’t the sweet or spicy putting Assassin collectively in captivity? I know that people have a bleeding effect! The WTF eagle appears again, believe it or not, and grab your hair! Does the ancestor scene just show climbing walls? I don’t know this ancestor, don’t you give him a little character modeling? Tell your story ancestors! Wait, is this over? Uncle Tie with an apple in hand, don't you set a boss fight for him? Is there such a waste of actor props? An Assassin went into the Tianbulu stronghold and assassinated the grand master. Is there no security in Tianbulu? Tian Bu La actually didn't show that his fellow would rectify people on the spot, but instead act as birds and beasts?
What the actual f**k!
Hollywood screenwriters disdain the characterization of their ancestors. The screenwriters arrogantly abandon the most important ancient plot of Assassin’s Creed—the national hatred, inner conflicts, city exploration, historical sites sightseeing, and same-sex dating (WTF) experienced by previous assassins/players. In their opinion, all is not important, they think the assassins The core is wall-climbing parkour, so the ancestors only need to contribute to the action scenes of running around the city, mixed with synchronization failures and leap of faith-and they should be called out by the way of shouting skills-fans I must be very happy!
Well, f**k you very much.
The content and structure of this movie are too bad. The reason is the improper selection of raw materials and the lack of focus (which can be attributed to the fact that the game producer has a small right to speak).
The original is a historical game! The modern and ancient plots in the movie are 1:1. If the length of the film cannot be packed with too many things, both sides will not be able to speak well, while being too rushed, while being chopped; sacrifice the ancestors’ character shaping and personal stories, and only let them Responsible for the action scene is a great waste and disrespect for the raw materials, and it also makes the protagonist's attitude change very abrupt (after all, he knows a ghost about his ancestors); the second plot in the context of the game There is a sense of disobedience when moved to the screen-after all, these plots can be refined and explained in the game through a process of more than ten hours and the entire series, and this part of the plot is actually displayed in a one-hour modern drama. , It's shameful to play. This genre so needs a good adapted screenplay, but it has been adapted by Hollywood screenwriters who have never played the game.
The narrative of the original game is actually worth learning. Since the film is eager to be made into a series, why not show the ancient scenes in the first big pen with a few modern plots? In this way, you can tell a more complete ancestral story, and let people really know this original character-his chance of entering MLM, the political situation and customs of Spain at that time, the atrocities of the Inquisition, the adventures of the protagonist and his brotherhood , The secret plan of the Templars... Can't all these issues that are inter-related on different levels be stated in detail? The compelling quality of the whole movie has been improved. Believe me, talking about the evil plan of the temple in the ancient environment has far less sense of disobedience than in modern times. And given enough time for the ancient drama, the audience can also follow the protagonist to stop and go to watch the scenic spots.
Modern drama can really be greatly compressed. The protagonist can obviously lie in animus most of the way. In ancient times, he followed the ancestors to see through the true face of the temple, and then awakened in modern times. For example, in the last five minutes, he occasionally found himself and his assassin partner being imprisoned, so he released everyone to believe together. The Leap of Leap (. The second part can justify the shooting of how the modern Templars who have adjusted their tactics and climbed to the top hunt the protagonist. The personal development of the protagonist is obviously more interesting than the two hours in the series.
What we cherish, you take it as a big silly film without sincerity, the level of pleasure is not as good as the game cutscene, except for the simple and rude stubborn, the core value Mao has not been touched. Obviously it is a romantic historical adventure game that encourages freedom, but it was made into a secondary sci-fi movie that wanted nothing. Ubisoft wanted to hit people after watching it. Yes, even though Ubisoft movie studio appeared in the opening of the film, they also participated in the film, but I very much doubt that poor Ubisoft has no right to speak. Before the film was released last summer, the guy who had been the CEO since the studio was founded in 2011 quit and started a production company of his own to adapt the game. I feel that this person may be very angry with the film, and I feel that it is better to leave.
Sins: The plot is changed, the characters are strange, the ancient drama is too few, the villain's combat power is 0, there is no boss fight, the cast is wasted, the screenwriter does not play the game
Sentence: Sync failed
View more about Assassin's Creed reviews
