Compared with inside job, the viewpoint of this film.

Lacey 2022-11-01 11:06:15

Inside Job is a documentary, from the perspective of ordinary people, non-financial people. The film focuses on how policymakers in the executive branch of the US government responded to the financial crisis.

Because these decision makers themselves were, or still are, people in the financial industry. In the inside job, they are the main targets of criticism, and their representatives are former Treasury Secretary Paulson, current Treasury Secretary Geithner, and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke. However, because of the shift in positions (especially Paulson's), policymakers must be held accountable for the health of the economy (rather than the board of directors of their companies), and to formulate policies by law. This means that without precedent and regulatory support for their policies, they must obtain legislative approval from Congress (the legislative branch of the U.S. government).

2008 is the year of the presidential election. It's really a rainy night. The ruling Republican Party is also hesitant in the legislative process and has gone awry.

Too big to fail is too accurate. For these big banks, the government cannot interfere with their business strategies. Get cheap government funds, but do not lend to SMEs, but take the opportunity to clean up small banks. If the government doesn't rescue them, the financial markets collapse and everyone is out of luck. What a dilemma!

View more about Too Big to Fail reviews

Extended Reading

Too Big to Fail quotes

  • Mack's Assistant: Tim Geithner's calling again.

    John Mack: Cover your ears. You tell Tim Geithner to fucking blow me. I'm trying to save my company.

  • Michele Davis: They almost bring down the US economy as we know but we can't put restrictions on how they spend the $125 billion we're giving them because... they might not take it!

    [the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Public Affairs upon hearing that the 9 bank CEOs may refuse to take free money from the federal government if they had to be held accountable for how they spent it]