Honestly, this is the best Woody Allen movie I've ever seen. "Annie Hall" is the same, both have a common feature, that is, discussing the meaning of drama itself. First of all, we know that the actor (forgot his name) is a comedy film actor, director and screenwriter, which is very similar to Wu Di's original identity. It shows that there are three issues the director wants to express: 1-----Fantasy World 2------- Confirmation World 3-----Conceptual World (referring to the conceptual acceptance that the audience sees). Come on, Wu Di's film expresses a very abstract concept of "phenomenon", that is, "discussing the film itself". The common point is to inspire the audience. However, speaking from the first: the male lead is an absolute screenwriter and director or even an actor. So, these identities are enough to dramatize "Being". However, so, it is because the director's series of thoughts of "not making comedy" were stopped by his producer and others. This is another plot point, which reflects the weapon of fantasy and reality. (Taoism talks about yin and yang) Therefore, the male protagonist began to "fantasy". As for what it is, the above film review materials are all available, so I won't talk about it. As I mentioned just now, since the director is a combination of reality and fantasy, he must go the way of Annie again. But it's okay, this time Wu Di added two new things, one is to create a self-reflection mechanism by dramatizing itself, and psychology doesn't talk so much. Of course, the second one is extremely important: "to achieve a phenomenon through", I call "success" a phenomenon, because the definition of success itself is not certain, but there is a final feeling, which is happiness. This film has always shown the gap between the fantasy world and reality through memories and fantasy, "a feeling of "movie" itself. Therefore, Wu Di has said that reality is often meaningless. This sentence is well said, it has been It's a bit of a play of the six masters! It is Zen, which has completely reached a kind of "heart" and reached the art of fantasy. "Ann Bruce": The 2017 movie also adopted the same method. This is First, second: discussing the meaning of the movie itself. We knew that the ending was successful no matter how we imagined it, but suddenly we were in front of the flashing screen and told us that it was fake! Then Wu Di stood there himself and put on The glasses are gone, which is very metaphorical. First of all, the movie is over, bringing everyone back to "reality" Telling us is false, when Wu Di stood in the cinema, everyone had different views and different understandings. I think it is the director who uses "reality" to tell us: "The film itself is a "phenomenon" rather than an "ideographic film", but while standing there, criticizing Hollywood is a very good moment, the director is integrating postmodern and Fantasy and reality wear and instigate, although it is a failure, the failure and the movie itself are a beautiful story. Finally, put on the glasses and go...reaching the meaning of the movie itself.
View more about Stardust Memories reviews
