I only see those people who have almost never helped children with practical actions, and stand on the commanding heights of morality and law with just a few words without spending a dime. There is no cheaper and more efficient love than this, without any responsibility, without the slightest evidence, just criticizing him in the worst and filthiest language is enough to mold himself as fearless of power and concerned with justice for children The gentleman.
I only saw a person who spared no effort to donate and raise funds for various UNICEF and children's hospitals around the world, and send sick, poor and abandoned children the money they need, their favorite toys, and yearning for the amusement. Field, longing for love and hugs. In the end, he was placed on the torture platform of "child molestation" time and time again.
Why does he do this? Maybe someone will say "he has money!" Yes! But the crux of the matter is that he has money, but he has no need and obligation to do these things, but he does. Some people may say "he did it to shape his public image". If so, has he successfully shaped his public image? no. What the public sees is him labelled "pedophile", "perverted" and "strange". Maybe someone will say "that doesn't mean he is a child molester". Not to mention that there is no evidence that he is! If you are really a "child molester", will you continue to care for and help children without any scruples after the law proves your innocence? But this "stupid" man did just that!
———— Transferred from netizen Satyr
View more about Leaving Neverland reviews
