The fantasy and fantasy presented by the director, as ex said, is like a music MTV, especially after watching "Fantasy Love", this "Lawrence of Two Sides" is similar in form, but also in content. It made me feel sick and tired (but I still watched the whole film soberly, if there is a second time, forget it). I also don't know if the director is chasing after the victory? I don't know if this deliberate stylization of things other than complex is to make up for the inability to express the inner activities of the protagonist? Or is it influenced by Bergman, in the plot The practice of inserting fantasy into him seems to be a kind of inheritance and advancement? Or as a director of gay identity, is such a public and narcissistic expression also a kind of submission to the mainstream? There is also such a person in our country, Guo Jingming, who pragmatically and shrewdly created a splendid dream for the public, but one chose to use sexual minorities to do it, and the other chose heterosexuality to do it. Since it is a dream, it is not real. It's okay, the audience just sits and enjoys it, and then it can be said that it's a really bad movie, and the director's unmistakable ambition is really annoying, and then it can also be said that this is the globalization of capital and the pursuit of profit and pride. Naked influence.
Going back to
(2016)
View more about Laurence Anyways reviews
