There are several pitfalls:
1. A habit of JT is very unpoliticized, that is, he likes to write letters with his identity attached, especially some sensitive letters. I don't know if it's overconfidence or what.
2. Two people lose both in this game; if JT controls NS reasonably and gives certain benefits, so that NS can only rely on him to live, and it will not be in today's situation; if NS has evidence and is willing to accept it, he can Live well. But after JT has the power, he can't kill NS, and he can't be tender, and NS is fighting to the death. What substantial benefits does the finale have for each other?
3. Is it that hard for a politician to want to kill someone? Should it be said that the British system is too sound or the screenwriter is too hasty.
All in all, the plot of this play ruined the acting skills of the two people. From the second half of 2002, it was only puzzling, funny and idiotic.
View more about A Very English Scandal reviews
