I know that many movies based on comics in the past were bad, but some people in the film critics said that it would be over if it was cool, so I believed this evil and went to see how this cool movie would look like. It turns out that the special effects are super fake, and the plot is also the routine of the previous comic adaptation of bad movies. The action should be as cool as possible during the battle. The more poses the better, the villain directly writes the evil on his face, the more fierce the better. The so-called cool is that a bunch of enemies with guns have to rush forward for hand-to-hand combat, and then get crazy AOE by the protagonist. Even if the enemy uses a machine gun to shoot her frontally, she doesn't dodge, but she just can't hit. This level of "cool", it is better to go directly to "Code 47" or "Total Recall" (2015 & 2012 version), the special effects are good and the rhythm is good, and the picture has a strong sense of viewing. A ten-level microdermabrasion filter. Or just play the 3A game masterpiece, the picture is more real than this movie, all kinds of explosion chases and building collapses are trivial. What? You said that you can watch the female protagonist's naked body in this movie? It's just that the back is exposed in a very dark scene, it's not interesting
Overall Rating: 1.7/5.0 Entertainment Index: 2.2/5.0 Box Office Performance: The budget is 30 million, this cost is very low, even the Denzel Washington action film in 2008 has 45 million, the cost is to build an unreal world and a lot of battles It's not easy, but that doesn't excuse the poor story and characterization. In the first week of North America, 2,558 screens were released, and 9.06 million went straight to the street. The overseas box office performance of 12.53 million was also very poor. In the end, the box office was 31.07 million and could not even return the book, so it could only sell the disc.
View more about Ultraviolet reviews
