One movie, two views

Vincenzo 2022-03-21 09:02:08

Generally speaking, the movie still needs to tell the story clearly first, and other things that you want to express, such as viewpoints, artistic conception, etc., still need to be based on telling the story clearly.

From my viewing experience: I highly recommend SHOULD WE DANCE. English version.

Inheritance and transformation; relaxation and relaxation; various characters; orderly retraction; reasonable plot; complete logic.

The degree of completion is so high, and I am amazed!

Then I solved the puzzle, and after many years I learned that there was a Japanese version and then an English version.

FOCUS GROUP

In order to make the series look good and attract the audience. A 1-hour film usually takes at least 2 to 3 hours. Let a group of people see it first, and when you like a button, press it and release it when you don't like it. Cut out the parts that most people don't like. This is the practice of experimental science.

The English version of SHOULD WE DANCE is equivalent to a field testing focus group, and the director of the Japanese version is also the screenwriter of the English version.

Recently, the no-life of the British drama has been really polished and rounded. From a dramatic point of view, it is better than Grandma's original version, but FOCUS GROUP & BRAIN STORMING can't match Grandma's imagination.

When it comes to storytelling, I still think Lao Lei.

Moreover, he expresses other expressions on the basis of telling the story clearly, which is also the best in my opinion.

I think it's probably something he's been practicing over the years.

Is Blade Runner Deckard a Cyborg? The director and the screenwriter hold their own opinions. Knowing the history of the film I understand that Lao Lei was certainly not a conscious expression at that time.

If it was said that it was unintentional at the time, I think Lao Lei is a consummate master. Let's take a look at the world of money.

It is generally believed that the money world is talking about: a rich man is very greedy and inhuman, and his own grandchildren are unwilling to pay the ransom.

The second time I read this movie, I am only interested in watching the rich man. I think the acting is too impetuous.

And what I saw was another story. I emphasize here that some people will over-interpret certain films. For example, Xu Haofeng said that Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is because Mu Bai likes Zhang Ziyi, and the fight with Zhulin Qinggong is two people flirting and making love. If I don't look back, I'll have a look.

View more about All the Money in the World reviews

Extended Reading
  • Emile 2021-12-21 08:01:05

    Before watching the film, I went to Getty Villa, where I learned that Paul Getty is a very generous, kind, and artistic person. But I didn't expect him to be so stingy and greedy in the film. It's good to know the two sides of a legend in one day. The two Getty estates in Los Angeles have also become extremely ironic and true.

  • Jacques 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    No matter how magnificent the ancient Roman Empire is, it cannot save this mediocre story. It fails to reveal the greed of human nature without any amazing imagination. 2.5

All the Money in the World quotes

  • Gail Harris: Paul? Come say hello to Mr. Chace. Or goodbye. I'm not sure which.

    Fletcher Chace: He's gonna be trouble with the ladies.

    John Paul Getty III: I already am.

    Gail Harris: I do hope you'll stay on with us. I know you had other ambitions, but..

    Fletcher Chace: Guys like me don't get rich. We get sidetracked too easily.

    Gail Harris: Shame.

    Fletcher Chace: Not really.

    Gail Harris: I think of you as family.

    Fletcher Chace: Kind of you to say so, ma'am. Was a couple things around the grounds that I've been meaning to see to.

    Gail Harris: Yes, of course. Don't let me keep you.

  • Gail Harris: They're still finding masterpieces stashed under staircases. Most of it's going to his villa in Malibu. Nowhere else could fit it all