A few days ago, I wanted to watch a musical, and found that the film was 91% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, so I paid four dollars and rented the film on YouTube, with high expectations.
The villains in the movie are backward, conservative, and evil white people representing the big bourgeoisie. They are gorgeous in appearance, rich and powerful, but selfish and shameless; on the opposite side are the black vanguard representing the lower class, and the gentle, polite and thrifty The juvenile pioneers bred by ordinary American people, they have clear love and hatred, they are short-sighted, and they can sing and dance, and are resourceful.
The singing and dancing parts in the film are very heavy and of good quality, and Vincent Vega contributed a lot of wonderful performances. But the film is more of a recorded musical than a cinematic musical. The dance forms are also relatively similar, and it is easy for the audience to experience aesthetic fatigue when they appear continuously. As a result, there is hardly a single paragraph that stands out to me from start to finish?.
After reading it, I went to check the ratings on IMDB again. Take a look at 6.6. This rating is closer to how I feel about the movie, I think it should be between 5 and 6: the type of "don't watch it without any special reason". That being said, IMDB mostly reflects the opinions of the average movie audience, while Rotten Tomatoes is mostly about movie critics. From this point of view, the political consciousness of the American people is still higher than that of me, a visitor from the third world; as for professional film critics, practicing the freedom of speech in the democratic world at the peak of political correctness, this kind of "high is too cold" "It would be a joke if I could understand the feeling of waiting at the foot of the mountain.
View more about Hairspray reviews
