For legal reasoning dramas, logical thinking must keep up, otherwise you will get dizzy

Gracie 2021-11-30 08:01:30

How to Get Away with Murder-The topic is very straightforward, not to teach you to obey the law, but to teach you how to escape crime. You killed someone, so? Why not be sentenced?

Most people in this world are ordinary people, and ordinary people have to follow the law and follow various rules and regulations; but some people make laws and make rules and regulations. These people are usually far behind, even if you talk about their world, you I can’t understand—how can elementary school students understand "Theory of Relativity", just know that "Theory of Relativity" is right; there is another type of intermediary, they play with the rules, use the rules, use absolutely rational thinking to survive in the rules, and get what they want. Something you want. I certainly do not support these people emotionally and morally, but rationally, they are too good and I respect them very much.

In this world, it is too difficult to live rationally. Ordinary people can't do it at all, nor can the people in the play do it. At best, they can only do it when they are discussing business affairs. They also have their own troubles in daily life.

"Impunity" is about those who play with the rules. In a lawsuit, as long as I take your case, whether you kill or not, I don’t care, I only care about what you tell me, whether you should talk about everything, and then I will pass laws and regulations to help you get rid of crime .

Sometimes this is a very immoral behavior, but to be honest, who knows what looks ethical, is it the truth in the end? Maybe everyone is lying. The group of lawyers in the play don't care about the truth at all, they just pay attention to the rules of the law, use various means to obtain information, and then piece it together to help the client get rid of crime.

One of the highlights of this play is that it does not only talk about one case, nor does it come from one case by case, but several cases at the same time,-this is what life should be like-in sequence and interspersed. In the reverse order, if you can't keep up with the rhythm, you may feel confused and dizzy; but if you can keep up with the rhythm and straighten out the logic, you will feel very exciting. It is very interesting. Anyway, the more I watched, the more enthusiastic I got. I believe that those who like suspense reasoning dramas, those who pursue logic and rationality, and those who like sophistry will love it very much. But if you are a fan of pseudo suspense drama, you will probably abandon the drama soon, because the plot is very fast.

I just saw the fifth episode. The plot is quite interesting. A female lawyer who has an extramarital affair may be involved in a murder case. The female assistant below seems to be interesting to her husband. The male assistant always hooks up with the female students, and none of the other students is safe. , Have to provoke something. Especially the little gay student, who completely relies on sleeping with people to get information, it's so slutty!

The homicide at the beginning, I still don't know what happened, I just feel more and more confusing. This reminds me of the classic beginning of "Desperate Housewives". The truth may not be fully revealed until the end of this episode. Obviously this is a popular way of telling stories in American dramas.

So far, five-star recommendation, a must-see for reasoning fans!

After watching the fifth episode, the supplement: The

general legal dramas are all about the sophistry of the legal provisions, and this drama also helps the suspect from multiple angles such as jury, emotion, and humanity. It doesn't matter whether you kill or not, because killing does not necessarily pay for your life, and there is legitimate defense. The key is how to persuade the jury and judges to believe that your killing is legitimate defense based on your killing. In cases involving family and marriage, a jury must be selected. For example, the pregnant woman is very moved by the battered mother. The jury supports you emotionally, and you win.

See the sixth episode to add:

Generally, legal dramas promote justice, but in this drama, justice is only a small part. In many cases, they are not promoting justice or even helping evil. However, for this group of people, what they pursue is not justice, but reason and logic. Isn't it for money, not for justice (occasionally for justice), but more for challenge, the more difficult the more interesting. In this way, I think of many hackers in our industry. They hacked into the banking system not for money, but for fun and challenging. For them, a group of highly intelligent businessmen who are absolutely rational, being able to accomplish something that others cannot do and overcome a difficult problem that others cannot—no matter what justice or injustice—is a breakthrough success. Feel cool. Of course, this sense of accomplishment is something ordinary people—especially those who skip the additional questions when they go to school, and can’t do it anyway, are just a waste of time—can’t feel it.

PS: As a lawyer, especially for several cases at the same time, the whole working group is under great pressure. Looking for information all night, calling witnesses, and drinking coffee constantly, this kind of work and rest is very harmful to the body.

I still recommend this show!

View more about How to Get Away with Murder reviews

Extended Reading
  • Christophe 2022-03-28 09:01:02

    One of my TGIT dramas. Although the editing is dazzling, and the main line is flying up and down, it is still fascinating (?). The tone is drowsy, and the law is not much, but focuses on attacking (gou) heart (xue). The characters don't seem to hit me. Every time someone shines, they will always be stupid for a while; a pair of little gays is slightly sweet but definitely belongs to the corner content, and can almost be ignored. If it wasn't for me, or Sang Ma's teaching, I really don't know if I would be able to persevere.

  • Crystal 2021-11-30 08:01:30

    Why doesn't the screenwriter write the hero to death???