shock. He "sees" the world and makes others "see" the world. Not only that, but he also went to change the world. This kind of concern for human beings and the world can be called "artists". There is really a kind of ultimate concern of "people and things, things and things", and indeed no matter the nation and the era, the highest pursuit of human beings is the same. Does modern "individualism" really have this level of care? Modern individualism still wonders if doing this is just a "spiritual sustenance", a way of pursuing self-worth? It cannot be denied that there is a so-called "self-satisfaction" component, but the reason why we distinguish between "self-satisfaction" and "ultimate care" is that they are completely different things in themselves. My character and some behaviors always make people think that I am a very egoistic person who advocates individualism and self-reflection, and opposes collectivism. In fact, I have never been against collectivism, but I have the most respect for people who have a "collective sense". What I'm against are those who actually seek to satisfy themselves in the name of "collectivism". If one day, I will also try to make the world a better place. It really corresponds to the Confucian saying, "If you are poor, you will be alone, and if you are successful, you will help the world."
View more about The Salt of the Earth reviews
