I read it for the first time a week ago and I gave it four stars.
This week, I couldn't look back on myself at many moments, and I realized the charm of this old movie more and more, and quickly changed it to five stars.
There are so many details that I take for granted on first viewing that I don't notice. For example, this film is so tender. When I say tenderness, I do not mean that there is no high-profile plot of animal instinct that stimulates human adrenal hormones. After all, it has the story structure of any movie, and there is no lack of succession and transition. The tenderness of "Little Shoes" lies in the sense of restraint. Its audiovisual language is handled extremely skillfully, and it is good at stopping, leaving a long aftertaste. There's no way to cry out loud while watching this movie, it just stuffs clumps of sore cotton into your heart, and the tingling grows slowly, slowly.
Iranian in-system movies are really interesting. Such a high proportion of children's films obviously avoids all kinds of controversial topics. It tells the bottom story and the warmest story in calm and temperate language.
Three years ago, I would have preferred Why Home.
Now, I'm going to like Little Shoes even more.
Well, I finally understand why Dai Ye talked about film criticism, the first one was about small shoes. Although she emphasized the logic between the plot group and the camera group in that class, its spirituality was the first reason why it was selected.
There are small fish kissing in the blue water waves, as if the mustard seeds became the universe at that moment.
View more about Children of Heaven reviews
