Charlie's PR

When the aftermath of the Tibetan independence incident was still unresolved, I saw a film review of "Make Love and Fight" in the magazine. In the film review, the author made some comments on the acting skills of Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts. Of course, from the film I think I might guess that they are both Democrats, purely reverse thinking, because the characters seem to taste like Democrats, but the way the film is described seems to be very Republican. If I remember correctly, twice The Iraq War was done by the Bushes. Hanks, who plays the National Defense Council, discusses a political investment with one of his partners at a Las Vegas high-end club and, of course, cocaine-drinking sluts, another right-wing American mistress. Joanna, in the movie this lady helped Hanks, not once, it's just that Roberts was so impressed by her past that it's hard to look at her role in the movie, what I want to mention about this movie is not the movie How to whitewash their political behavior, how to flaunt themselves. But I want to talk about two issues: one is the conflict between personality and people. In the film, the Greek-born Guss has a conflict with his superiors. I appreciate it very much. There are several such conflicts in Chinese culture. People can do this to the power for their own demands. The so-called people are not afraid of shadows. Of course, Gus's cleverness has helped him a lot. It does not mean that there is no tendency in the West.

The second is public relations skills. Although I am very inclined towards Jonas's unexpected quick and competent public relations skills, the image of the senator's entertainment in "shooter" is very good. I didn't expect Charles this time to make me think that it is politics or politics. Lies for action, or self-deception (from the phrase "How come I didn't know he had a son." for missiles. Joanna's previous arrangements, such as meeting with the President of Pakistan, and later persuading the Speaker of the Senate to agree to a field trip , as they were asked to get the framed blind girl out of jail. Is everything an act of the state? No, in our comprehension we would consider it an individual act, politics seems to be in our understanding of having enough material possessions Only on the basis can it be possible to intervene in politics. This is the capital I understand.

The second part of PR is to turn friends of friends into friends of our own. The cooperation in the Middle East is just a double reed sung under the influence of inducement and coercion. I think that Duan's handling was too ugly, but it was clear that with the help of evidence, the two of them were lured and coerced to successfully complete a trip to the Middle East.

The entire film is a complete and successful PR process, in which the United States found the lowest-cost tool against Eastern power under the Cold War. So much so that we understand at the end of the film that the director was not willing to tell the truth at first, not his own intention, but the story requirements, "There was a child in the past, ..." I admire the preconceived way of thinking in the West, At the same time, it is found that such traces of thinking are becoming more and more obvious in modern people.

So I want to be preconceived. Why doesn't our country know how to deal with Western public opinion in a public relations way?

By the way, the last plane in the movie was shot down by anti-control guns. What type of plane is it? It looks like an F16? Could it be that there is no Pakistani that provides a bird's-eye view of the fire control radar? Secret, I think the person who takes the whole incident as a secret has a secret: he is a fool~

View more about Charlie Wilson's War reviews