But four stars is a bit high for a movie. Russian films about war can reach a very good level as long as they don't shoot randomly. It's true that the war scenes are real and the tragedy is poetically told, but that's about it.
It didn't do what it wanted to do. I'm so uncomfortable, I want to complain too much, maybe it's not right, but this is how I feel.
"The Female Sniper," which shows itself as a feminist film. But it's too wrong. It perfectly deduces that a woman must be very special when she goes to the battlefield. She is given preferential treatment by men who love her. In the end, she is spiritually sublimated because of the men, not the war itself. Then he talked about how people's opinions about her changed after the war. In return for women's rights, isn't this a disguised recognition of the patriarchal society's compensation for women? Conflict is indeed an effective way of telling, but it can't be from start to finish, it can't be black and white. It is better to put the deduction in the respect of "the submarine that Stalin personally sent to pick her up" in the real story to better explain women's rights.
The balance does not rely on complementary advantages. Instead of throwing so many stones on the scales on the women's side, wanting absolute balance, shouting ah we want equality, we can do whatever they can. Women's specialties are the foundation of independence, so that dignity can stand, and that they can move forward side by side logically. If there is only one sense of opposition, relying on congenital defects and male advantage projects to compare, not exploiting their own advantages, protesting that they cannot be equal, and getting the same treatment as men, guess who is Nora in the end? Who is really discriminated against, and who is really discriminated against? Therefore, it is strange that the subject matter of sniping and feminism is equal and not biased. You can shoot the girl Lyudmila, who is actually a legendary sniper. She is a hero. You can also photograph Lyudmila, a Soviet soldier, who has many irreparable wounds caused by war under her strong appearance. She is a great woman. But you can't shoot her as a girl stepping on the men who died for her successfully growing into a great sniper hero.
If you have to talk about love, it is better to make a pure war romance film. Why should the heroine be Lyudmila? Her best friend's love story is even more touching.
Lastly, love the prototype. I watched her speech on station B, and my eyes were bright. Needless to say, I can also understand that her achievements are very good.
I am a fighter, 25 years old, and killed 309 fascists. My country is my only religion. I want to tell you that we will win.
View more about Battle for Sevastopol reviews
