But it's still more like not being in the same place, but why are three people going to tropical islands so cleverly? Why do they all go to the same place? I don’t think there is any reason why they want to be separated. It can only be understood as not three. The problem between individuals may be that after the big incident, the two brothers went to their mother’s house or somewhere when they were still in jail. It should be possible that the two brothers squat in a jail, and then contact them after they come out, but the business is temporarily gone. They all went to do their own things, but I believe they will get together again after the temporary separation.
Although the name is savages, I haven’t read the original, but I think the movie’s vision is better. It seems that the discussion on the ending is still focused on the fantasy ending and the realistic ending. Are foreigners more brainless and feel that the Holocaust ending is more tragic More shocking. . . In fact, this is a dream is upside. The reality version of what is happening is worrying. . Because I can't go back to the past.
At the end, we are like barbarians, returning to the most primitive state, living cruelly and imperfectly. Some people may understand that it is still a three-person relationship. I think it is because they are no longer together. . . .
The biggest problem with this movie is actually the name. I don’t know what the original text means. Anyway, the movie doesn’t make me think that the focus is on the threesome. In contrast, I am more willing to understand it as people who escaped like them and stay in the circle. Compare with the surviving people.
I like chon to tell ben, don’t be nervous, you’ve died since birth
View more about Savages reviews
