As the protagonist of the film, although he is endowed with family, lover, friends and many other character relationships
and a realistic environment constructed by real life scenes, the most crucial character's behavioral motives are
completely illusory - "killing people for movie expenses" , which is really an illusory
motive that can no longer be illusory. Love movies? Want to be famous? Express some kind of voice or vent your dissatisfaction? You will find that
none of the answers are exact because the answers simply don't exist. The filmmakers simply didn't want to attach any real and social meaning to such a character and story, or that everything they did was subverted and didn't want to rebuild. To use a phrase that many film school students most often say is: make a fun film.
As for the narrative perspective that everyone is talking about, the novel technique has an undeniable effect on the entire narrative. There is also the "on-the-spot experience" stimulus brought by the "first vision" to the violent behavior. You can read it in a long article. There are a lot of aesthetic meanings and the like, but in fact, this is just a
new visual stimulation to the audience. Of course, it is not to belittle the technique itself, but because
the film is really "form over content". (Don't tell me "form is content", I really understand)
———" Many critics have objected to the abundance of provocative scenes in the film, but producer Andrei clearly pointed out that "man bites dog" The purpose is that it can make people laugh, and after laughing, it can make people reflect on why they still laugh when they see such cruel content." - The creator himself said it very clearly, but this reflection is too simple a little.
View more about Man Bites Dog reviews
