View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
12 angry men
Ora 2022-09-14 02:04:30
Because I haven't seen the black and white version of the TV series in 1957, the reduction of the film as a TV series feels good, and I feel a lot. The scene of the movie is a jury meeting room, 12 jurors, a simple scene arrangement, but the interpretation is a story about legal justice and the jury system. 1) The majority vote of the jurors can decide the life and death of the criminal, the will of the majority, is this the justice of the law, and their decision is the truth? 2) Can jurors perform their duties well, not out of their own selfishness, likes and dislikes, is the jury system reasonable? Are the decisions of the majority in line with the truth? 3) Is the testimony of the witness credible? Can witnesses be impartial and impartial? Can the testimony of the criminal's life and death certificate be decided? 4) Everyone has the right to live. We must treat each life fairly. No one is born a criminal, and his character cannot be determined according to his growth background. 5)
Extended Reading
-
Juror #10: [his last line, when asked if he still thinks the boy is guilty of murder] ... Oh, I *know* he's guilty; *all* his kind are guilty, and of far worse than murder. But I couldn't care less, because you've made it clear that you don't care either. You and them deserve each other. So I vote Not Guilty.
-
Juror #8: He's not your son. He's someone else's.
Juror #4: Let him live