persist in

Braden 2022-03-25 09:01:15

Begin to write about a reporter who touches a minefield in order to win the Pulitzer Prize. It seems very selfish. I see half of it completely on her side. For her persistence, for the protection of the secret provider, she endured the pain of the detention center and endured her husband. betrayed and endured the loneliness of not seeing his son. Shocked when the whistleblower was finally revealed. The specific content will not be spoiled.
In the middle of the interview, the reporter answered quite wonderfully. Another paragraph was a statement from the lawyer to the Supreme Court justice, "As the years pass, the power of gm becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power," he said, "whatever their politics want only to perpetuate it and the people are the victims.".
In the end, I just want to say that the US emperor is too dark

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading
  • Leonard 2022-03-16 09:01:05

    The overall rhythm and description of the story are good, but one link is not set reasonably. What this film has always emphasized is to insist on the truth. Then the reporter can conceal the identity of this CIA special tool and just talk about the truth about the president's assassination. Since she believed what the female agent had investigated, she was clearly on the side of the female agent. The female agent was her source. How could she expose her? Especially her actual source is her daughter. . . . Hasn't she thought about the distress that this announcement will bring to her and her daughter?

  • Nakia 2022-04-24 07:01:17

    Absolutely great movie! The structure is compact, the rhythm is well grasped, the acting is outstanding, and the ending is perfect. Best movie I've seen recently.

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Dubois: Okay, I'll do all the yadda-yadda. Now you were within your rights to print the information that you obtained. However, you are not within your rights to protect who it was that gave Erica up to you, who exposed her. It's a 1982 law called the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. Your source is in a great deal of trouble.

    Rachel Armstrong: [Interrupting] I have no intention to...

    Dubois: [Overrides her] I'm doing the yadda-yadda, remember?

  • Dubois: People are inherently decent, I have found.

    Rachel Armstrong: If that were true that would put you out of a job, no?