There is no point in the plot arrangement, the clues are confusing, and the change of Jian Xin's thoughts cannot be seen, and then the stalk of saving Xun is used again. In fact, it is completely possible to take Kenshin to get the second reverse blade as the ending and climax of the whole play (since there is a third part), ideologically, Kenshin has experienced that he cannot kill - if you want to save people, you must kill - pull out Killing with a knife - finding that the reverse-blade knife is completely gone, there is no murderous intention; in terms of the plot, this paragraph is connected with the previous plot of the reverse-blade knife breaking, and the decisive battle can only be fought after getting a new knife, which also echoes the subsequent plot. However, the performance of this part of the movie is very sloppy, just a cutscene. But at the end, he added a superfluous battle at sea, and used the stalk of the first part again - going mad to save Xun.
If it weren't for the introduction of Masaharu Fukuyama who finally appeared (visually, it is Master Kenshin Kiyojuro Bigu), it would be an unnecessary plot.
View more about Rurouni Kenshin Part II: Kyoto Inferno reviews
