Having seen so many brutal, bloody, unexpected deaths on the big and small screens, the scene where the heroine dies in this movie is the most shocking, saddening to me... And puzzled at first. On the one hand, I feel extremely sad for her doom, and on the other hand, as a person with an almost "disabled" spatial imagination, I only see her and the male lead in the elevator - the elevator is stuck in the middle of two floors - the male lead Open the elevator door - the hero climbs out safely - the heroine is pulled out by the hero - the heroine dies in a pool of blood, I don't know when and how she suffered a fatal accident until I suddenly figured it out. I know that everyone who is smart has already understood it, and it is obvious to people with normal spatial imagination. I wrote it out, it was ridiculous and generous, I was ashamed and ashamed:
when the male protagonist climbed out, the female protagonist was still fine, and then the male protagonist started Pull the heroine out of the elevator car door, until the heroine comes out half body, everything is still fine, suddenly, just before the heroine's thigh is about to come out, the elevator falls, at this time the heroine's lower body is still in the elevator Inside the box, the upper edge of the elevator that suddenly fell cut off the heroine's legs, leaving half of the heroine's body in the elevator... This scene is simply too shocking, and I can't help but feel sad.
Also, as an atheist, when I first read I Origins, I was unavoidably resisted: I don't believe in a higher existence, I believe that all phenomena can be explained by some kind of physical, chemical or biological principle. Humans can't explain it now, that's because science hasn't developed enough to have a suitable theory for the time being - but I was moved by this film after all - when the heroine said that in the laboratory, The words about light and insects: insects without genetic modification can never see light, so light is an unimaginable concept for insects, but light is always on top of insects, whether it is aware of it or not, light exists, But only those who have vision can prove it, and by the same token, perhaps there is something "over the top" of humans that we cannot experience, that we feel is absurd, unimaginable, or that we simply do not Think about it, but does it exist? Perhaps only another existence with that kind of cognitive ability can prove it.
As a new science student, I may be too arrogant or careless to say this, or maybe someone has said this, never mind: I would say that all science can do is to apply some Some paradigms are used to prove or falsify "propositions", but what are propositions? A proposition is a statement that can be judged true or false. However, not all phenomena in the world belong to the category of propositions, such as light to insects without photoreceptor organs, such as "some existence" to human beings, they cannot even be written as propositions in the world of corresponding objects, they are more like It is "Carl Sagan's Dragon", which can neither be proved nor falsified by the means that exist in the world of the corresponding object. For them, science seems powerless. Does it exist? does not exist? How can anyone know?
(Some people say that there is a fire-breathing dragon in their garage, another person doesn't believe it, so here is the following dialogue.
A: "There is a fire-breathing dragon in my garage!"
B: "Then please You open the garage door and let us see."
A: "It's a pity, my dragon is invisible, even if you open the door, you can't see it, in fact, only I can see this dragon."
B: " Then doesn't it breathe fire? Let's test whether the temperature of your garage has risen."
A: "Unfortunately, the fire from my dragon is cold, and it can't raise the temperature of the garage. Even so, this dragon does exist."
B: "Oh!? Then can you let me spray paint into the garage, if it exists, it will definitely get a little paint on it, and it will show up."
A: "It's a pity that my dragon's scales can't get painted, so if you did, you wouldn't be able to see it. But it really exists! Why don't you, a fool, believe it?"
) From the hero's stubbornness to science and the heroine's belief in the supernatural, I prefer the attitude of the hero's wife and experimental assistant. On the one hand, she is rigorous, diligent, and has solid scientific literacy. When they say "O for open-minded", don't close all other doors because of belief in science.
It's messy, please correct me.
View more about I Origins reviews
