When the protagonist Amy realizes that she doesn't belong in this house, she leaves the house and starts looking from house to house. She is looking for it purposefully, looking for the house she wants, hoping to be the "Amy" there, and obviously she is changing her destiny through her own choices. She chose a few, and finally locked it in the room where there was no quarrel, no fight, no arguing about the decoration, the high-end furniture, the attention to detail, and the affectionate lover who kissed her in this room. But the "Amy" in this house is in the house. If she wants to have such a lofty life, she must make the "Amy" in the house disappear and take the place of that "Amy" herself.
There is no problem with what I said above (this is not a rhetorical question), and then there is a violent incident, and then the movie ends immediately.
Speaking of which, the problems emerged:
1. Amy, who woke up lying on the sofa, wanted to go to the bathroom to check whether the knocked down "Amy" was still in the bathtub. This is the camera. It can be seen that a woman just came out of the bath after taking a shower, and she was not surprised to have a conversation with her as if she had just met. Apparently, that "Amy" was not in the bathtub.
Explanation: That "Amy" is gone, whatever the reason, it's gone.
Inference: Completely disappeared in this space. Or wake up early in the morning, run out of the house in fright, go to the police station or a safe place to hide in the hospital, at least meet the premise of not being seen by everyone.
2. Amy went out, met her man, said her ring had fallen off, and gave it back to her. At this time, the camera is given to Amy's hand, and you can see that both rings are there.
Explanation: The things that I brought from the original time and space have not disappeared, and I have also merged into this world.
Inference: Same as inference 1. That "Amy" thing didn't disappear, and it was inferred that "Amy" didn't disappear either, that Amy and her were in the same time and space, or took Amy's place in another time and space.
3. The man received a call and said that it was Amy who called her, which was obviously connected.
Explanation: Confirmed the inference that the "Amy" in 1 and 2 did not disappear. The phone can come, at least that "Amy" is still alive!
Inference: There are two possibilities for "Amy", in this time and space, or in another time and space.
If it is the first case, Amy is still in this time and space, then the call her man receives will be: "OMG dear, I know you will not believe it, but last night a woman like me was knocked out Me, I'm in a safe place such as XXX hospital or police station or XXX friend's house, I'm going crazy, I think you love you, come quickly".
If it was the second case, and Amy was sucked to another time and space, the phone call her man would get would be: "JF finally fucking connected! Where are you darling? I don't fucking know I'm there. Nah, this place is different from our family. There are several idiots who claim to be our friends and one idiot is about to die. They say it is you. I don't believe it. I don't believe it. I don't believe you. Where you
are This is the case, because at least the space will be balanced, and there will be no two Amys colliding with each other.
What do you think?
View more about Coherence reviews
