"Contains a lot of spoilers!" After watching this movie at night, I couldn't help but start thinking about the details in bed. It's like a cup of coffee, the more you taste, the better it tastes. I didn't realize until the end that my wife, Christine, stood outside the courtroom, relieved to hear Leonard's acquittal, that she was doing all this to help her husband, and before that, my lawyer, Wilfrid, and I were both beaten by two of them. People are fooled by their flawless cooperation and by their own preconceived impressions. After the truth was revealed, and re-thinking the whole thing from a different angle, some doubts arose. 1. Did the wife know from the beginning that Leonard was dating the lady, and did he take part in the murder? If the wife's final confession was the truth, then at ten o'clock she saw her husband with blood on his sleeve come home and tell her that he had killed a woman, begging her to save him. So, why does the husband have to behead first and then play? The first possibility is that maybe he understands that if he consults with his wife in advance, his wife will never agree, and he does not want to take off the mask of his kindness in front of his wife, so he pretends that he is a manslaughter, and suddenly becomes obsessed, precisely because he knows his wife He loves him deeply, and he is confident that his wife will understand him and help him. Another possibility is that he was really at fault, but the possibility is very small. According to the time, he should already have the young mistress at that time, which may be his motive for murder. 2. Who planned this deception with his wife as a witness for the prosecution? Christine said at the end that it was a lawyer's sentence: "No matter how much a wife who loves her husband swears and swears that he is innocent" gave her inspiration, but from the beginning of the two people acting, it can be seen that they two early Planning this scam, the mastermind should be the "inspired" wife with a "fearless" spirit of sacrifice. Maybe the husband didn't want to abandon his wife at first, but the price of this game is that Christine will be convicted of perjury, which is the most favorable time for him and his mistress to fly away. I believe that Leonard also loved his wife deeply from the beginning, so he didn't care about her second marriage and brought her back to China. Maybe after middle age, you will slowly change your mind if you can't stand the temptation, and slowly fall to an irreversible situation. 3. Why should seasoned lawyers be confused? The first is Leonard's amazing acting skills, which almost deceived everyone. Why do you say almost? From beginning to end, the old lawyer asked Mr. Whether Carter believes that Leonard is innocent, his answer is: "I'm not sure". Of course, as a defense lawyer, only by believing in the innocence of the defendant can we have the possibility of turning defeat into victory, but Carter's fair and skeptical attitude is worth admiring. Everyone else has made a very serious and very common mistake of believing the "facts" they see, and having this preconceived notion loses the ability to judge, to have sympathy for Leonard and for Christine These emotions defeated reason, and they were led by the nose in the end. There were actually many flaws in those letters. Why was there no envelope, and how did the woman get these letters? There is no postmark address, and Max, who has not been found, takes this as evidence, isn't it a bit reckless? Of course, if you put yourself in your shoes, you might not think so much. In contrast, at present, we make this kind of mistake every day. We are led by the nose by the news media, and we listen to rumors to create prejudice against someone. What is even more frightening is that our three views are swayed by the people or things around us. After the antecedents have been roughly clarified, I see that the details of the movie are handled very well. Leonard appeared relaxed as soon as he came in, as if I was innocent anyway, and the police wouldn't treat me like that. Pretend to just know the news, and simply want to tell his wife about this "good thing", the performance here is very exciting, it is hilarious, and it makes people believe his innocence, after all, he is so naive How can people kill people? The psychological quality is so good that even the old lawyer passed the lens test with a high score. Then the wife appeared, and when she learned that the old lawyer did not defend her husband, she first complimented him, and then cleverly used aggressive tactics. , After having this preconceived opinion, I lost the ability to judge, sympathy for Leonard and disgust for Christine, these emotions defeated reason, and finally I was led by the nose. There are actually many flaws in those letters, why there is no envelope Well, how did that woman get these letters? There is no postmark address, and Max, who has not been found, takes this as evidence, isn't it a bit reckless? Of course, if you put yourself in your shoes, you might not think so much. In contrast, at present, we make this kind of mistake every day. We are led by the nose by the news media, and we listen to rumors to create prejudice against someone. What is even more frightening is that our three views are swayed by the people or things around us. After the antecedents have been roughly clarified, I see that the details of the movie are handled very well. Leonard appeared relaxed as soon as he came in, as if I was innocent anyway, and the police wouldn't treat me like that. Pretend to just know the news, and simply want to tell his wife about this "good thing", the performance here is very exciting, it is hilarious, and it makes people believe his innocence, after all, he is so naive How can people kill people? The psychological quality is so good that even the old lawyer passed the lens test with a high score. Then the wife appeared, and when she learned that the old lawyer did not defend her husband, she first complimented him, and then cleverly used aggressive tactics. , After having this preconceived opinion, I lost the ability to judge, sympathy for Leonard and disgust for Christine, these emotions defeated reason, and finally I was led by the nose. There are actually many flaws in those letters, why there is no envelope Well, how did that woman get these letters? There is no postmark address, and Max, who has not been found, takes this as evidence, isn't it a bit reckless? Of course, if you put yourself in your shoes, you might not think so much. In contrast, at present, we make this kind of mistake every day. We are led by the nose by the news media, and we listen to rumors to create prejudice against someone. What is even more frightening is that our three views are swayed by the people or things around us. After the antecedents have been roughly clarified, I see that the details of the movie are handled very well. Leonard appeared relaxed as soon as he came in, as if I was innocent anyway, and the police wouldn't treat me like that. Pretend to just know the news, and simply want to tell his wife about this "good thing", the performance here is very exciting, it is hilarious, and it makes people believe his innocence, after all, he is so naive How can people kill people? The psychological quality is so good that even the old lawyer passed the lens test with a high score. Then the wife appeared, and when she learned that the old lawyer did not defend her husband, she first complimented him, and then cleverly used aggressive tactics.
Afterwards, the wife's "cold blood" towards her husband and her husband's "affectionateness" towards his wife won the sympathy of the old lawyer and the entire jury for Leonard. The woman who delivered the letter (Christine) appeared very well, and the old lawyer really took the bait, which was the key to the final success. In fact, Christine doesn't need to tell the following truths. It is a sentence from the old lawyer: "If I am the prosecution lawyer, it will be a lifetime." Leonard was with him and told him the truth for sympathy. Finally, the reflection of the glasses happens to hit the knife on the table, which catches Christine's attention and drives the plot. The most crucial factor is the great coincidence that Leonard and the lady have the same blood type. . . This is the top 1 suspense movie in my mind.
View more about
Witness for the Prosecution reviews
