View more about A Dangerous Method reviews
A film supported by the actor's looks and acting skills
Jettie 2022-03-25 09:01:10
I watched this film under the introduction of a public class teacher at the university. I thought that a film based on the academic discussion of Freud and Jung would benefit me a lot, but I didn’t expect that half of the film I saw would actually have I can't stand the thought of changing the film. Not to mention the procrastination and tediousness of the whole film, I can't even find the main line of the plot. Baidu Encyclopedia says: "On the eve of the outbreak of the First World War, Zurich and Vienna were ready to use shocking methods to give mental hygiene. With a shocking blow. Freud (Viggo Mortensen), Jung (Michael Fassbender), and their common female patient, Sabina Spilerin (Keira Nye) As a patient, Sabina Spilerin was beautiful and inspired Jung and Freud; as a symbol of love, Sabina Spilerin The depths of the soul inspired these two giants in the field of contemporary psychology. However, the inexorable and chaotic relationship between these three men eventually led Jung to part ways with his teacher spiritually and academically. However, he and Buddha Lloyd's theory, however, forever changed the face of the history of human thought." First of all, I think that if this plot is from the perspective of moral love, there is no such thing as a relationship between the three people, because Freud never had any thoughts about the heroine from beginning to end. does not constitute an aspect. If it is based on academic arguments, then the union and division between Jung and Freud exist, but as for whether it is because of Sabina, I think it has nothing to do with Jung and Sabina. Before the relationship, he had a disagreement with Freud, and his ideas of some leaps made him unable to limit himself to Freud's view that "sex" is the main source of all problems, and Freud I think that all my research is rooted in sex, which is the point of his footing, and this is the aspect of his authority. Therefore, disputes and differences because of the heroine do not exist at all. For the whole film, if you want to improve academically, I advise you to watch another film. If you are because of the acting skills and appearance of the protagonists, it is still worth it. When the heroine plays the patient, some of the exaggerated acting skills really show the behavior of some patients who are suffering and involuntarily. The character restoration is also good.
Extended Reading
-
Arely 2022-03-27 09:01:09
In the history of academic gossip, a married man had an extramarital affair, and finally had to break up with her and his spiritual mentor. However, since the director used a film to explain the ambition of the beginning of psychoanalysis, he must be objective and neutral. From my layman's point of view, Jung's theory is so evil. In the end, I can only use the sad man to gain the audience's sympathy. And Miss Knightley's performance made me a fan who couldn't hold it.
-
Crystal 2022-03-29 09:01:03
Not salty or bland, just average. What stands out is Knightley's chin, and what is obviously lacking is her breasts. If you use it to stand out and make up for the lack, the bumps will be offset and flattened to the end.
-
Carl Jung: Sometimes you have to do something unforgivable... just to be able to go on living.
-
Sigmund Freud: Experiences like this, however painful, are necessary and inevitable; without them, how can we know life?