At the beginning, it was said that freedom was the effort of Spartacus, but it didn't appear until two thousand years later. After reading the film review, I knew that this was not Kubrick's favorite work, probably because it was a romantic movie, with passionate music throughout. , beautiful picture, touching love, and even the ending is very perfect and touching, this is indeed a mediocre work.
About Greece, about Rome, about the United States, about Western civilization, I think they are closely related, but they are out of tune with our East. In the eyes of Westerners, the East is a mystery, a civilization that they do not understand exists independently of them, and there are many of them. Like the East, they have the right to like it.
The movie has a strong heroism, but it started for a reason, it was the black man who ignited the fire in his heart, and when he was about to be killed, the black man suddenly turned to the nobles and jumped up, but to no avail, but This flame was seen by Spartacus and continued to burn in his heart and eyes.
There's a very strange thing about this movie from beginning to end, as it seems right now, it's that every slave thinks he's not and shouldn't be a slave, I don't know how they divide slaves, but in this movie Here, the morality and consciousness of each slave are no different from the current Western civilization. If it weren't for the sense of the picture, I would definitely think it was an ordinary modern drama, not a historical drama. Maybe it was because of the need for such a thing, maybe it was The language and life at that time could not be photographed, and the answer could not be that the situation at that time was the same as it is now. If it is as stated in the film, then Rome is really an amazing country.
I think this film should be read as a tragic poem, beautiful and spectacular.
Of course, there is a more important point in this movie, that is, the concept of the restriction and distribution of power has already existed in the West thousands of years ago. But this does not hinder its greatness at all. There is a particularly interesting place. It was the place where they held the parliament. When they finished the parliament, the fat member went out and bought a chicken. The center of their power is really very The civilianization of China is really incomparable with China. Who made us a big country?
I like Lao She’s saying in the same hall for four generations, Chinese people have the wisdom of Chinese people, and this wisdom is to swallow one’s breath and live with it. It’s the best when a family is together. Changing dynasties has nothing to do with them, maybe it’s not time for a regime. A big family has a long life. No matter how hard he tries to maintain it, he will eventually be overthrown, just like the various dynasties and generations behind Qin Xiang, but the funny thing is that after the overthrow, they still practice the old way, and then find a way to maintain the regime, just like a movie. The little gay guy in Li insists on Jane like him, or I will kill you, but it is still far worse than the Chinese dynasties. You have to be convinced. If you don’t agree, I will kill your whole family, and even dig your ancestral grave for you. I read The history is a bit short, but it gives me the feeling that the various dynasties on the land of China have not found any changes or progress. I don’t know how to describe the Chinese dynasties as giant babies who have been crawling on the ground for thousands of years and have not yet learned to stand up. , or an old man who is too old to stand up since he was born!
Interested in the history of Rome and Greece now, from which the present West was born. The East and the West are really different in all aspects, but the emergence of the Internet of Technology has opened up the whole world at once. We can find anything we want to know online. It is really incredible. It can be compared. With It's easy to see a lot of things in comparison.
View more about Spartacus reviews