It's not because they want to be praised because the stylists and so many staff including directors don't necessarily want to be praised. They are staff who work and get paid. They want to be praised or not.
This is a movie dedicated to supporting actresses.
In order to hold the female lead actor and vilify the female supporting role, even the hairstyle is so bad. On the one hand, it shows that the beauty and charm of the heroine is really not attractive enough, on the other hand, it shows that this woman must have a background. On the one hand, when encountering this kind of film and this method, the actors and directors can be black all their lives, and they have already used their means to tell you how incompetent they are.
Her aunt and the young Cameron Diaz are still in the same frame. Diaz is still playing the 20-year-old beautiful rich daughter, who is innocent and infatuated in the play, while Julia Roberts is a The older woman, in the play, is mainly responsible for making trouble and robbing other people's boyfriends. Even with such an opponent and such a character setting, they still gain global fans and enter the 20 million club.
Look at this, the opponent is an unknown actor, and the character setting is a scheming bitch, but it still needs such an obvious ugly female support. The difference between the two is known.
This question can also answer by the way why Julia Roberts has been selected as the most beautiful and first place by people for many times, and what is star charm, aside from the body and facial features, just look at who can win against high-quality opponents. Among celebrities, in the entire entertainment industry, it is only by being able to compete with one another to win.
It's not amazing that this heroine is well-dressed. When you look at the cover, don't you think that the neck is short and the legs are not long.
View more about Wild Child reviews
