Finally, when the female boss explained the rules of the game to the two, the female lead was surprised that she was classified as a "virgin". The reason for the general surprise was that she was not a virgin. .
So what is the true identity? The following is my personal opinion:
Virgin: The fool in the movie, smokes marijuana every day, and explores the true meaning of life. I guess I am not interested in that.
Scholar: Athlete in the movie, Thor first recommended basic academic books to the heroine when he was at the hostess's house. Obviously, he has certain academic attainments.
Athlete: The Scholar in the movie, the black man was exceptionally vigorous when he first picked up rugby.
Whore: Virgin in the movie, the heroine looks pure, but he has a criminal record with the professor. .
Fool: Whore in the movie is stupid, but she also showed obvious hesitation in field battles in the forest, unlike whore's style.
So the damn thing that saves the world in the end is actually the heroine. If the heroine is not saved at the dock, the world will be peaceful.
What is the intention of the director to do this? It's probably just a trick of his. Isn't this film a mockery?
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
On August 19, I added
this thing to write after watching it in the cinema for the first time I didn’t read it carefully. I just watched the screenwriters with subtitles. They are really clever and metaphors for joss whedon
. They are really powerful . And complete the ritual. After all, this ritual only needs to make God happy.
But these characters all have so-called "naturalness" that are different from the identity they are "set". These "naturalness" in my eyes constitute a new "five" that is different from the role setting. This may be the director's. A little trick
View more about The Cabin in the Woods reviews
