Really, whether or not they have personally experienced the "dictatorship" or were brainwashed by the news or gossip, many people have reached a consensus about living in a "non-democratic, no freedom" country. Therefore, every time I see a similar film, I can't bear to want to be a hero who "woke up the world" for one minute.
But it’s a pity that the liberal and democratic people of the United States don’t want to talk about dictatorship or resistance and revolution at all. They talk about something. For many countries, something that can’t be discussed is probably called “transcendence”. "Humanity", or simply with Chinese characteristics, is called "sacredness".
At the beginning of the film, the devastation after the war was used to "terrorize" the audience-anti-war consciousness.
Dividing people into five factions also involves "racial discrimination and anti-discrimination." The five factions are divided into selfless, knowledgeable, friendly, fearless, and honest. The selfless is the ruler, the erudite is the researcher, the friendly is the producer, the fearless is the guardian, and the honest is the arbiter.
This is the outstanding advantage of the five kinds of human nature. From the beginning of this classification, it has been implied that this is the topic of exploring "human nature and social system, that is, the theory of state management".
The protagonist of the story is the "different", a person who possesses multiple human advantages at the same time, both male and female protagonists. But in the film, they are going to be killed. Why? The original saying in the film is, "They are not easy to be controlled and will destroy the faction classification system."
In other words, the disagreements are a type of people outside the system, and their appearance itself proves the flaws of the classification system of the faction. However, those who maintain the system are unwilling to improve the social system and instead resort to killing.
The first point to be explained is that the “institution defender” here is not the selfless faction who masters the government, but the leader of the erudite and fearless faction. Why is this so? From the film, we can see that the selfless people do not know how to hurt people. They are born to help others. It is precisely because of this that the erudite school who thinks they have the truth, feels that this group of incompetent guys cannot protect the current situation. The system maintains the "hard-won" peace, so there is the main story, usurpation and killing.
As for the repeatedly mentioned in the film, the scholarly slander of the selfless, corruption and corruption are all just a political strategy. It is estimated that even the scholarly does not believe that a qualified selfless sect will corrupt. However, the selfless faction cannot maintain the system without being shaken. It is too tolerant towards those who disagree, but it is intolerable by the erudite faction and the fearless faction leader.
In fact, the film also talked about the obvious shortcomings of a certain kind of human nature, which is also an important factor that promotes the development of the story.
Selfless, overly simple, "do not know how to hurt people under any circumstances" is just a small matter, too selfless dedication, do not know how to control the excessive behavior of opponents, is the big thing. In addition to being easily usurped in power, the film also described a small detail, that is, "before the faction test, an erudite school walked among the selfless sects and asked the selfless sects if they had embezzled food, and those selfless sects faced this way. The unreasonable accusations made me hesitate and dare not say anything. Only the heroine wanted to interrupt and fight back, but was stopped by her brother. "The heroine’s behavior at the time has actually shown that she is not a pure selflessness. Pie, but the disagreement.
The erudite school, self-righteousness is only a minor fault, but absolutely conceited, and rational to an almost cold-blooded degree, is the real horror. You can’t imagine that the female boss’s persistence in refusing to shut down the system to death, and the heartbreaking performance after being controlled and shutting down the system, is so real and so cruel. In other words, in the face of the truth she believes, not only the lives of all people are not important, but even their own lives are not important. Isn't such a person a "person of faith"?
Moreover, the erudite school is also a big camp that opposes the disagreement. And they are also the implementers of the so-called "transcendence of humanity", they can be regarded as authors or directors to discuss the key to "transcendence of humanity".
I joked with my friends before. Humans are a kind of animal, but if we escape from animal nature, we will become humans. In the future, humans will definitely evolve again, separate from human nature and become "Holy", and then solve everything we cannot do now. Things to solve, such as corruption, discrimination, war and so on. The erudite school here is undoubtedly a little bit interesting. Their rationality has almost defeated human nature, and they only follow what they think they do, and they have no different intentions. While the scholars said that there are weaknesses in human nature that need to be overcome, while pursuing peace is what they want, but in the end they find that they still fail in the hands of those who disagree.
So I want to say that what the scholars think of overcoming the weakness of human nature, and even "transcending human nature", actually stems from human nature, or even a weakness of human nature, called paranoia. This is also where the erudite school fails the most. I think that true "transcendence" will not be resisted, just as true "truth" will not be questioned.
It can be said that for thousands of years, if you want to surpass humanity, you have only stayed in the dark stage of "only a few people can do self-practice", and has not yet reached the stage of "accumulating enough quantitative changes to lead to qualitative changes".
Returning to the film, the failure of the erudite school just proved the victory of human nature, and the victory of human nature is not achieved by simple factions, but by those who have multiple "virtues" (human nature).
Let's talk about the Fearless Faction. They are the main part of the film. After the heroine was found to be a disagreement, in order to find the Fearless Faction female who let her go, she joined the Fearless Faction and followed them every day without fear of death.
The weakness of the Fearless is obvious, that is, it cannot resist. This has to make people think of a sentence, "It is the duty of a soldier to obey orders." Yes, the Fearless are soldiers, but they are still self-aware people. Therefore, the Erudite School invented an injection to control these people who are born with a very weak sense of resistance as a killing machine.
By the way, I can insert a word here. The scholars believe that "self-awareness" needs to be eliminated, because they are harmful, not conducive to control, and even less conducive to the protection of the system. This can be regarded as a discussion of "authoritarianism" rather than "transcending human nature." But I still feel that this is not just a question of autocracy, but an explanation of the "advantages of autocracy." It can be regarded as telling why there is autocracy in state management.
The kind of absolute liberals and staunch confessors will probably never admit that the most free country will still give its administrators the right to "authoritarian" in the constitution. It can almost be said that the law is dictatorship (can be modified and cannot be violated), morality is democracy (conventional practice, that is, the minority obeys the majority, the so-called moral kidnapping is basically a tyranny against the minority)
As for the friendly and honest parties, There is less ink in the film, so I'm just talking nonsense. The friendly faction can basically be understood as a participant in a non-violent non-cooperative movement. They will not fight with people, and even arguments are unlikely to happen. Such a person’s weakness is good bullying, all kinds of bullying, it is estimated that this is the case. So the director is too lazy to talk about them.
Honest people will not be any better. They have no lies and cover-ups, that is to say, there is no right to privacy, and they will not engage in "hypocritical social activities" with others. In the film, the first friend that the heroine’s Go-Fearless pie meets is from the Honest pie, but she’s pretty good, although she can say something embarrassing, but at least it’s not too much.
By the way, after talking about their respective weaknesses, they also said that they switched to factions. I also thought of a sentence repeatedly mentioned in it, called "Faction is higher than blood".
This sound is anti-human. Is there anything "higher" than parental affection? We Chinese have a saying, "Blood is thicker than water". However, if you think about it the other way round, when you understand factions as faith, it becomes "belief is higher than blood."
Is it possible to contact various historical stories or news reports at once? Yes, the discussion of human nature cannot avoid these.
Of course, when I talk about it, I have missed a very crucial part of this system, the "beggar without faction". It’s hard to imagine that a person who is not knowledgeable enough, or not selfless, brave, friendly, or honest, will be reduced to a useless class, and can only survive through the relief of the selfless and live in the fearless. During surveillance, he was also discriminated against.
From my personal point of view, this is an irony of "elite culture" and an exaggeration of "human rights violations." But on the other hand, the director does not seem to particularly sympathize with this category of people, but Putting hopes on the "more elite" disagreements, from the beginning to the end, there is no shining point among these beggars.
Perhaps, the author consciously divided the "heterogeneous elements" into two categories, the former are those who fail in a certain type of personality test, and the other is the success that can pass the test to prove the superiority of a certain personality component. By. Naturally, the loser cannot take on the important task of "saving society"... The director is still a person who admires "elite culture", and the Mi Di concept immediately collides with the Chinese concept.
Speaking of this, you may feel that it is very messy, yes, this can be regarded as a transcript of a casual talk between me and you, and it is not an article. But I can sum it up a bit. The film fictionalizes a world, mainly talking about the flaws of a system and the ultimate victory of humanity.
The flaw of the system is that it ignores or even obliterates the diversity of people, and because of the extreme flaws of a certain personality, it leads to the occurrence of anti-human incidents. The triumph of human nature is nothing more than "love" and the blend of the five personalities of "selflessness, erudition, fearlessness, honesty, and friendliness".
In the final analysis, the author does not intend to really discuss the "transcendence of human nature" (seemingly contradictory to what I said at the beginning), but is talking about the "defects of human nature", clarifying that a certain kind of personality is too strong and the defects caused by it are very Terrible view. By the way, I also explained that maintaining peace does not rely on killings. Institutions... The latter ending seems to be forgotten, so I can’t tell.
There is so much nonsense, but I have to say one last thing. The filming is actually really average. There are parkour plots and shootouts. Anyway, I didn't feel it. It was just a fool. But simply put it in science fiction movies, at least this kind of structure and discussion will not make me immediately disgusted, but very down-to-earth, that is, in terms of state management and system design, similar mistakes must not be made. , We must focus on the diversity of human nature, as well as the defects brought about by the excellent characters that are regarded as virtues.
Apart from other things, look at those people's public servants, who are not even capable of corruption, and can they not be usurped? (Are you kidding me?)
My compatriots, please listen to me. The revolution will not burst out suddenly, nor will it be silent forever, but please don't kill the innocent. In the past, there was a group of people who loved this country as much as you...
View more about Divergent reviews
