The 13th #法罗岛电影节# will bring you "Diving Bell and Butterflies" on the 5th screening day of the main competition unit. Below, I will bring you the evaluation of the souls trapped on the front line that are beyond bondage!
Feifei:
The way of narration hinders the construction of the situation.
Queen of the Faroe Island Empire:
Formally caused an unforgettable impact on my young mind.
Little Love Songs of Paris:
The use of a large number of subjective shots is involved in the narration, and the director's skill is indeed evident.
We Min Hee:
Posture visually, but the script did not keep up. And as the film progresses, choosing to abandon the subjective shots throughout the process is more like the director's inability to continue shooting like this.
George:
Compared to the director, I feel that the actor and the soundtrack are more remarkable, but it's still a bit worthwhile. The rehabilitator said that the moment elle's model became thinner and thinner, she had a wonderful and peculiar feeling.
Matsuno empty pine:
I like the first-person subjective lens at the beginning very much. Due to the existence of the camera and the screen, the image of the diving bell is concretized. The agility of the camera is the butterfly. Unfortunately, it is too short and the latter is slightly mediocre.
Bat Bats:
The body is sealed, but thoughts are flying freely, and human thoughts cannot be imprisoned. It is better to use the first-person perspective on the theme of humans breaking through the shackles of life than in FPS shootout movies.
RIVER:
The more I see it, the more I feel that the text itself is touched by the text itself, which has an indescribable lightness. The insertion of the subjective lens makes the movie a bit fragmented, weakens the thickness of the performance itself, and does not bring visual shock or touch, which is really a failure.
Outisss:
A movie I like very much, it’s very suitable to watch it slowly when I turn on the computer in the evening. My favorite part is that when the male protagonist blinks his eyes to write the text, he whispers in the depths of his mind, but it’s a pity that it slowly changes later. It was mediocre, but the first half of the movie was amazing.
Fruit trees:
The form of the monologue is reminiscent of Jarman's "Blue". However, the rich picture, which complements the theme of "the butterfly with freedom in the heart", is more uplifting and healing than "Blue". In fact, this kind of movie is difficult to shoot (limited scenes and limited performance techniques), which more reflects the director's skill.
Full of Zhao+:
Like it, but under the sad and desolate background, such romantic and beautiful, fairy-tale decorations are used (the soundtrack photography is too good), probably because the film is used to create dreams, so that his imagination, memories, and ideas are so beautiful The way is on the screen. People can live on only imagination and memories.
Mozart Lensu:
The diving bell bound the body, but the soul came out like a butterfly pupa. The whole story wandered between Jean's reality and subconsciousness. I was moved by my life while lamenting the cruelty of fate. But I feel that the film is not well performed, and lacks the charm of the image as if hiding under the text, like advertising the original.
O. Yin:
Atresia, lying in bed paralyzed, like trapped in a diving bell, struggling and shouting, unable to connect with the outside world; looking back on life and perceiving family affection seems to be sent to butterflies, galloping in imagination, and reconciliation with the heart. The freehand composition and editing of the film are combined with the use of a large number of subjective shots, which unknowingly substitute the audience into the inner world of the protagonist, and the wonderful soundtrack adds a lot of color. It's a pity that in the second half of the journey, it was a little bit weak, and the story could not be told more deeply. Although the 400-stroke reproduction surprises fans, it also shows that the director's skills here are also poor.
Jeff Jiang:
What a suitable carrier the movie is for this story. Dominic’s left eye has changed from a signal light to a movie eye, so words can be spoken only by staring. The image once again fulfills a major meaning of its existence—to defamiliarize our daily functional audiovisual experience. Going further, aren’t the diving bells sinking into the deep sea and the butterflies flying in the imaginary space just like the cave of the image itself? After all, if one day we only have eyeball movement, what we can continue to do is probably only watching movies.
The song is wrong:
The protagonist took Caesar's actor with this movie. I can only say that Caesar is really a stinky fish and shrimp. At first glance, you may look forward to it. The stroke patient and the world are silent, difficult, and large, but most of the time. The subjective lens of time undoubtedly makes all this a bubble, and the performance in the rest of the time is also tasteless. When it comes to subjective lens, can I not see the connection with non-subjective lens? It looks more like the director’s failure to show off his skills forcibly, and the most failure is that he can’t feel the heart of creating "Diving Bell" at all.
No one at midnight:
I don't quite understand the director's intention. Compared with the steady performance of "When the Night Comes", his skill is even regressive. The subjective lens that cannot follow the whole process without really giving too much visual surprise and imagination, and the Malik-style non-subjective lens that flies into the macrocosm and all things in nature from time to time, there is no deterrence between the two. Only showed a sense of embarrassment of incompetence. And thanks to it, even the pathological acting show that is exploitative in nature and makes the actors screaming and satisfying the audience can't show it. In this embarrassing answer sheet, there is neither the weirdness of diving bells nor the vulgar beauty of butterflies.
Bwheat19920313:
Some movies make people cry silently in this way, and some life stories are so unforgettable for a long time. We claim to be "prisoners of the universe" every day, but when we are truly imprisoned by our own bodies, do we still have the courage to face this world that has become fragmented and cannot be pieced together before our eyes? The individual trapped in the diving bell is heavy and immobile, and the butterfly flying in the blue sky is light and unrestrained. The two seemingly unrelated things are actually the difference between the blinking eye and A heart that never says no to life. If we can face the world in this way, even the glacier that has fallen into the sea and no longer has a trace can suddenly spin back to the origin. Dare to fight this world, even if he leaves the field with scars, his pale face is still smiling at the last moment before he disappears into the darkness. From "When the Night Comes" to "Diving Bell and Butterflies" to "The Gate of Eternity", Julian Schnabel's biographical films have never let me down. He will always be the best director in my heart.
#FIFF13#DAY5's main competition score will be released for everyone later, please wait and see.
View more about The Diving Bell and the Butterfly reviews
