It exudes a captivating narcissism with a distinctly personal touch. It creates a chaotic Kerry universe of space-time fantasy. The core is the expression and accumulation of emotions. Therefore, on the one hand, the simple story is fragmented, constantly emphasizing the key elements and emotions, and on the other hand, it weakens the understanding of the story itself The narrative requirements and precision of the story, in turn, give the audience an intellectual game-like fun and pleasure of jigsaw puzzles of fragmented stories, and experience the beautiful audio-visual and emotional experience it creates. These, compared with roadside picnics, are actually not breakthroughs and innovations in models, but upgrades in scale, skills and quality, but the novelty of roadside picnics when they first appear in front of people is irreplaceable. , to say that it is not as good as the previous work is not to say that it is not as good as the roadside picnic in absolute quality, but that it failed to break through or even reproduce the bright spot of the roadside picnic, which is a gap in expectations. But for the audience who are obsessed with this style itself, Bi Gan is still the same Bi Gan, and even the upgraded earth is more mature and beautiful than a roadside picnic. Another cliché that can be debated is form versus content. Bi Gan is a director who pays attention to content and pays attention to form and aesthetic experience. To some extent, his content lacks depth and meaning. In addition to the emotional experience of narcissism, it lacks depth at other levels. Whether there can be a breakthrough in a realistic sense beyond emotion and aesthetics, I personally think it may become a key point in determining the height of Bi Gan's future achievements.
View more about Long Day's Journey Into Night reviews
