Have a snack. . .

Hannah 2022-04-23 07:04:59

See also the fool who said that this movie is difficult for the country to make money. Damn, how come you don't know how to move your brain before you move your mouth! If nothing else, without Liu Zhenyun's novel, without this movie, no one would know about the 3 million people who turned into loess, and you still talk about your mother's national disaster!

Furthermore, according to this group of logically crippled arguments, films of this type should not be touched at all, and "touching" is to blame ( ⊙ o ⊙ ) ah! Just imagine, a movie made with a national disaster would have a box office. Is there any reason for this? The national crisis of consumption has hurt the feelings of the idiot. Does it still have personality? So it is best to start from today, from near to far, all about the Cultural Revolution, the war of liberation (for those with brains and consciences), the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, the Sino-Japanese War, the Manchu Qing Entry, the Shame of Jingkang, the An-Shi Rebellion, and the Five Husbands. . . All films should be banned.

View more about Back to 1942 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Angela 2022-03-19 09:01:10

    The three tears that left the deepest impression: 1) The black cat that had been raised on the road to escape from the desert was not killed by the bombing of the plane. In order to allow my sister-in-law to have a stutter to give milk, she peeled and boiled it, and she also had to drink cat soup; 2) "Why marry? For you? Tomorrow you will have a wife to sell, and we can both survive." 3) The end credits are released: In 1949, Chiang Kai-shek was defeated and retreated to Taiwan.

  • Zander 2022-03-19 09:01:10

    You don't have to have any respect for this movie, but you have to be in awe of history. When you are young, you should read more, and when you are old, you will know how to exert your strength.