From "The Killer Isn't Too Cold" to today, I have always believed that Lobisang is a director who adheres to the combination of humanistic care and artistic creation. After many years of no news of him, hearing it again will inevitably excite fans. In this movie, I think Robison wants to express something through Scarlett's Supergirl Adventures, or goes backwards and wants to make a commercial movie with a profound philosophical proposition. But regardless of the purpose, I think the philosophical propositions behind the film are only secondary, and we don't need to argue too much on this issue. This film is far inferior to "Interstellar" in terms of depth and breadth. ", even though he really wanted to express the proposition that existence is in time, life is in time, and matter is in time, but his expression is very simple, and at most it is only an introduction to the story, or just chewing on it.
I think the most commendable part of this film, aside from the unremarkable story, is the way it tells the story. There are not only the profound connotations of shallow taste mentioned above, but also the image montages that Robbisang uses a lot. In the last time Scarlett travels through time and space, this kind of photography makes the picture particularly spectacular. It is a bit of a momentary walk through history and see through life, but it cannot be described in words. feeling.
This film is far less exciting than the Hollywood time and space sci-fi blockbuster. The hypocritical literary style reveals the taste of European directors. It can be regarded as an attempt by the French on popular science.
It feels average, and the black widow who is approaching middle age is not attractive. I don't recommend it or collect it.
View more about Lucy reviews
