After reading the movie reviews, I found that everyone is using their lives to watch these movies with a large amount of information. For a while the painting appears there, for a while the book shows its face here, and for a while there is a hidden footnote here - that's why watching a DVD is worse than watching a movie, because the footnotes are small and you can read them gone.
Fortunately, I haven't come to the point of watching a movie at this level of detail. There are too many details to be too lazy to grasp. It is still a stream. So the so-called criticizing the society is turning people into objects. Everyone is a HOOKER, look. It’s fine to read movie reviews. Someone will read it a hundred times and explain it in a few sentences, so I don’t need to do this kind of thing.
But why this film amazed me, mainly because the relationship between the male and female protagonists is worth digging.
As a couple, how can you try to live your life so candidly - despite how much of it has to do with smoking marijuana? ,—that's a clear sign that something's going to happen, but it's always a good thing to do. The male protagonist's derailment and the female protagonist's infidelity complement each other. The difference is that the male protagonist is looking for opportunities to derail in reality, and nothing backfires, while the female protagonist cheats in a dream, it is just a dream. So which is more disappointing? In fact, it is quite disappointing. A couple can love each other deeply, but the fact is that this does not prevent them from falling in love with other people, or liking other people, or simply wanting to fall in love with other people. At this time, you say, let’s be open and honest, what kind of enlightenment does it take to achieve this? The male protagonist's I'm sure of you is definitely nonsense, not to mention. So oh, a certain wine secret meeting, I don't think this is spraying, although there is such a fact that those people are big people, they all come from limos, and the poor diaosi will disappear when they call TAXI, but This is indeed the solution to the problem. According to my understanding, and the way the film solves the problem at the end, FUCK is to make life intuitive. Look at the uncle who opened the PARTY at the beginning, and later proved to be one of the leaders of the secret society. There are various works of art at home. As well as literary review, in a word, this person has been immersed in the joy of intuitive experience, not to mention Schopenhauer's will to feel the dick, this state is a state of positive and happy life. Drink old wine, play billiards, appreciate art, have a party.
But on the other hand, to live like this, the society must be built on the level of cannibalism. Obviously, this can only be seen from a microscopic perspective. Everyone is immersed in intuition, and everyone is obsessed with the objectification of will, which is obviously not feasible, because society has a social operation method, and people always eat, drink, and lax. There is always a mess of work in every aspect of society. Therefore, this kind of Dionysian culture must have the premise that someone can eat people. There used to be colonies, but now there is a proletariat. And the male protagonist is in a position of no superior or inferior, so he will be bullied by others and sold by others.
According to the stratification of capital, the law of universal gravitation is used. Whoever underestimates the satellite, that's it.
This film shows you the status quo, but there seems to be no solution. Is the last FUCK a sincere suggestion or a mockery? I think the benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom. Anyway, you can't see utopia in your lifetime. Wherever you go, you will see the appearance of the impossible triangle.
So you have to eyes wide shut to live a good life.
open your sister's eyes
View more about Eyes Wide Shut reviews
