As a successful forensic psychoanalyst, Jack Gramis another university professor. However, he suddenly became the focus of public attention because he was assigned to check the sanity and mental state of the serial murderer Jon Foster. He is very confident in his conclusion, and this conclusion will not only directly affect the judgment of the court, but also put Jon on death row. But at this moment, Jon suddenly took a bite back, accusing Jack of suspicion of operating in the dark. Jon believes that Jack induced one of the witnesses and the sister of the victim to provide evidence against him. However, just the night before Jon was sentenced, another murderer imitated Jon’s homicide method specifically to find women to kill, and committed two cases in different places. The already settled matter made waves again, so the court decided Delay the trial. At the same time, Jack also received an anonymous call. The mysterious voice on the other end of the call declared that he had only 88 Minutes to live, so he was ready for the funeral. With the joint help of FBI agent Shirley Barnes, friend Frank Parks, and assistant Kim Cummings, Jack did not panic. He began to think carefully about who set these traps and decided to go first. Start with some suspicious students I have taught, and then the school security and the women who have had a one-night stand with him
.
88 Minutes movie plot
2021-12-30 17:21
Extended Reading
-
Idell 2022-04-21 09:02:14
The heroine is so bad...
-
Bennie 2022-03-26 09:01:06
Although it seems like a wishful thinking plot, the director still controls the rhythm of the film relatively well, and he tells the story. Pacino propped up the entire film, and if it wasn't for him, he probably wouldn't have seen it in the first place, and he also shows a sense of tension and relative flexibility that differs from his age.
-
Jack Gramm: Justice and truth - where do they intersect?
-
[last lines]
Jack Gramm: [to class] Hello, everyone. Jon Forster's dead. His execution was not a cause for celebration, nor is it an vindication. It is a chapter in the road to justice and recovery. I personally don't believe in capital punishment. I do believe in the rights of victims. I do believe that they deserve recompense, no matter how significant or insignificant it may be in comparison to the loss suffered. I've suffered such a loss and, like some of you here, I have spent those sleepless nights trying to desperately to squelch down that vile-ish instinct for revenge. And I have wondered if this pain will ever abate. I've learned that time does not heal the wound. It will, though, in it's most merciful way, blunt the edge ever so slightly. So... what is the first thing one should remember when entering a courtroom?