Judgment at Nuremberg movie plot

2021-12-30 17:21
Nuremberg was originally a low-profile city in eastern Germany, but an unprecedented trial in 1945 made Nuremberg famous. In order to implement the court regulations on prosecution and punishment of August 8, 1945 and the court regulations attached to the agreement, on November 20, 1945, the justices of Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France entered the 600th courtroom of the German Nuremberg Court. The first International Court of Justice in the eye-catching history, the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, opened here.
By Jordan Spence . Tracy, Richard. The film co-starred by Widmark and others is a star drama. Tells about the legal relationship of the German Nazi plan in Nuremberg after World War II. The reason for the arraignment of the three defendants was to perform seed-breaking operations on the Jews. The presiding judge was the American Herut, who claimed that two of the defendants were not guilty; while the German Attorney General Yalink kept silent on the matter, but the prosecutor Colonel Rosen fiercely accused the defendants, so the three people Have a heated debate. The interrogation continued. The senior officials in the United States hoped to get a good proof of the crime committed by Germany in the trial, so they put great pressure on the trial, but Groot insisted on the justice of the law and gave the most fair judgment. When announcing the verdict, only Yalin expressed his appreciation for the attitude of the Chief Judge Herut. This film is a socialist producer Stanley. Kremer put the memoirs of the Presiding Judge Herut on the screen and filmed them, using outstanding acting skills to show the entangled relationship between ethics and ethics. The film won the Best Actor Award and Best Adapted Screenplay Award.
In very difficult circumstances, the Nuremberg Trials lasted 315 days and held 218 court sessions. Justice and evil once again fought fiercely in different forms. All parties in the trial provided 2,630 testimonies, 240 witnesses appeared in court to testify, and 300,000 sworn certificates.
<< Foxtrot evaluation action The Sweet Life evaluation action >>
Extended Reading
  • Vinnie 2022-03-27 09:01:09

    This movie can manipulate people's mind. The memory of Auschwitz visit is all over again. Three hours went by so smooth. Burt Lancaster, you got me again. Spencer Tracy, Richard Widmark. I wish I could age like Marlene Dietrich.

  • Israel 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    "This is the predicament of our times" is technically inconspicuous, except for a few sudden push-pull movements, the lens is generally stable, the lighting is always bright, the grayscale is appropriate, and the picture basically exists to present words. It chose the part of the Nuremberg trial against German judges, and placed the jurisprudence on national subjects and international interests for discussion in a very special context. The American presiding judge in the film finally chose to ignore the national positions of the United States and Germany, but His life imprisonment sentence was destined to be unfulfilled in the Cold War appeal. In addition to the court trial, two clues were arranged: the relationship between the presiding judge and the widow of a German military officer, and the guidance of the U.S. military and the government to the military prosecutors. The line is a bit blunt, mainly raising the question of who should be responsible for the war and genocide. The second line records the constraints of politics on the law. The whole plot can feel the tenderness of the United States towards Germany, combined with the narrative of the Cold War in the play, I feel that there is a critical stance (and an interesting reflex) on Cold War policy. The performances of the actors were wonderful, especially the little German lawyer who responded quickly and emotionally.

Judgment at Nuremberg quotes

  • Mrs. Bertholt: One can't live with hate, I know that. Dan, we have to forget, if we are to go on living.

  • Hans Rolfe: Remember, it was disclosed at the tribunal that Mr. Feldenstein bought you things. Candy and cigarettes?

    Irene Hoffman: Yes.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Dogesflix's opinion. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 workdays after receiving your email. If you find any instances of plagiarism from our website, please send an email to: info-contact@dogesflix.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 2 working days.

Recommend Articles