When someone intends to restart the "Spider-Man" series, as a bystander, it is difficult for you to discover its specific meaning. The first three episodes of "Spider-Man" won amazing global box office in 2002, 2004 and 2007. If you are a 20-something stunner, then this series of movies has accompany you through half of your life. The producer attempts to reinterpret this indiscriminate comic, just like Shakespeare's historical drama, to give "every generation" a deep-rooted "education". Regrettably, for adult audiences like us, the launch of "The Amazing Spider-Man" seems a bit rushed. Everything in the film seems blunt and boring, and there is no sense of novelty at all.
Our hero, Peter Parker, is played by Andrew Garfield instead of Toby Maguire, but what I don’t understand is that this actor who has performed well in "Social Network" is in "The Amazing Spider-Man" Why is there always a mist of tears shining like the eyes of Bambi the little deer. And his love relationship with Emma Stone in "Help" is also artificial and unbelievable-inexplicably excited, inexplicably sensational, there is no such thing as the old version of the hero and the heroine who separates and combines between vagueness and clarity. Tangled. As for the big villain, Dr. Connors, who was promoted by the film, he finally appeared in the shape of a huge lizard. Although there are many creepy special effects shots in the film, the dullness of this villain is really disappointing. The stone man in the Four Heroes.
