Tom and Jerry evaluation action
-
Coralie 2022-03-28 09:01:08
The funny thing about this film lies in its existence rather than its content, and once again touches on the fatal wound of many non-human classic IPs at the film and television level: what is the meaning of human beings? In addition, I have a hunch that in a brand new era where all major media giants have their own independent streaming media, there will be more and more such movies, which has to be said to be a slightly happy sadness.
-
Jedidiah 2022-03-16 09:01:06
7/10 In order to restore the animation, the animal is two-dimensional (not a typical two-dimensional). Therefore, the physics engine of the two-dimensional world and the three-dimensional world hardly affect each other, this feeling is both weird and a little weird. It seems to be suitable for all ages, but in reality it is quite the opposite. The target group is the one or two groups of people who have grown up watching cats and mice. Because children can't get real dialogue and some American humorous stalks at all, for non-cat and mouse fans, the human plot is simple and sloppy. Whether it is animated or real, the comedy effect is very poor. Throughout the whole scene, the young people were only confined to a knowing smile, and they didn't even hear much of the children's laughter. Of course, I restored a lot of the bridges in the cartoon one by one. After all, this made the smile engraved in the DNA move a bit, so I still bought it. As for the rest of the plot, just enjoy it without brain map. Ps privately thinks that Tom’s adaptation of playing piano and singing is a big failure. The classical-modern, mime-playing adaptation has lost its greatest essence, and it doesn’t taste like that.
-
Kayla: [after Jerry hands her his tiny ID] Oh, wow! This is so detailed.
-
Kayla: With a what now?