-
Hilbert 2022-04-23 07:01:16
A standard American comic book hero movie made by Burton may be the most impressive after watching the Joker played by Jack Nicholson, but there is still a big gap compared with Nolan's prequel 2. Of course, the time difference is very long. There will inevitably be some subjective and objective factors, but the height of the prequel 2 is indeed unmatched by other anime hero...
-
Fabiola 2022-04-23 07:01:16
When this hero without any superpower first took to the big screen in 1989, did he know that he had been forever recorded in film history and became a classic passed down by comic fans day and night? Three and a...
-
Jana 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Khan, the logo in the poster and in the film I always thought it was two rows of teeth up and down until the end of the film. . Still wondering why there are two rows of teeth? ....
-
Napoleon 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Although it is a work by Tim Burton, I really think it is naive. If I read it in elementary school, I think it will look good, now. . . . ....
-
Wendy 2022-04-23 07:01:16
Burton's version of Batman's pioneering work, gothic irony and exaggeration, is very suitable with...
-
Alexandrine 2022-04-23 07:01:16
The ones shot more than 20 years ago are not much worse than Nolan's...
-
Elaina 2022-04-23 07:01:16
I didn't watch it, I watched the Tim Burton version, but after watching a third of it, I started to feel sleepy again (sorry Tim Burton), and only read the remaining two-thirds after a day. If you've seen Bell's version of Batman and then watch this version of...
-
Marion 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Fast-food hero movies, with no pretence at all, are not suitable for Xiao Wenqing to watch. Tim Burton also had a time when he couldn't get a dick, maybe he was young at that time. The depth is not enough, and the length is not enough, and needs to be further...
-
Fidel 2022-04-22 07:01:03
Black aesthetic style, now the special effects are rough and give people an old feeling. Batman's appearance is too staged. Personally, I prefer Nolan's version of Batman. The role of the clown is well...
-
Michael 2022-04-22 07:01:03
This one is actually of a very high standard, especially considering that it was filmed in 1989 and Batman was weakened, Jack Nicholson's Joker is actually very reductive. Comparing the Joker in Nolan's version, there are some scenes in the Pay tribute to the Jack version, acid flower and big gun are not in the new version, although the new Joker is a movie history classic, the Jack version is really worth...
Batman Comments
-
Ottilie 2022-01-25 08:01:55
I thought it would look good
There was a strong feeling of nausea and motion sickness when I watched and after I watched it. The biggest feature of this film is not her clichéd plot, it's not that the ugly duckling turns into a beauty, it's not that the devil drives Batman out of the arena, it's not that the selfish and ugly...
-
Ottilie 2022-03-17 09:01:02
Now it looks like a sense of the times
In 1989, the movie "Batman", this should be the first Batman series movie, the earliest I saw it was 92 years, the penguin and catwoman, of course it feels that the 92 years is more classic, but if I re Maybe it's different. After all, the Batman of Nolan's trilogy is currently a relatively...
-
[Jack is primping in front of a mirror]
Alicia: You look fine.
Jack Napier: I didn't ask.
-
The Joker: My balloons. Those are my balloons. He stole my balloons! Why didn't somebody tell me he had one of those... things? Bob, gun.
[Bob hands him a gun, Joker shoots him]
The Joker: I'm gonna need a minute or two alone, boys.
