-
Nico 2022-04-06 08:01:02
The externalization of light and shadow to express the psychology of the characters is the ultimate Dreyer's. This is what images should do, including montages. Maybe he is very suitable for adapting Dostoevsky.//I thought Dreyer was better at The mise-en-scene looks like he's a very good filmmaker//Religious thinking has a mystery and focus that philosophy can't reach//It's amazing how human nature is portrayed so...
-
Alex 2022-04-06 08:01:02
1. Compared with [The Passion of Joan of Arc] and [Words], this film is more ambiguous and ambiguous. Everyone is struggling and tossing in lust and possessiveness. Everyone is guilty, but everyone can be understand or understand. Good and evil, holiness and filth are often intertwined and intertwined with each other. Unfortunately, most people only hold a simple, either-or dualistic thinking - both the attacking and eradicating heresy and the witch-hunting movement follow this crude logic. 2....
-
Alejandrin 2022-04-06 08:01:02
God said: Let there be light; Satan disagreed, so there was darkness. Dreyer sees light as good, separates light from...
-
Jacklyn 2022-04-06 08:01:02
Abu Sharon said that he blindly paid attention to sin and obtained a short-lived pleasure by discovering it, but he shielded a witch only to occupy her daughter, and he did not forgive another witch just to prove that he was one of the noble ones. How many people have been trapped under the wings of mysterious religious beliefs that many people can't understand, and how many shameless God spokespersons with different appearances are...
-
Mae 2022-04-06 08:01:02
Dreyer's approach is actually similar to that of Neorealism. Speaking of people like Bergman, Bergman is always based on people, and then achieves a complex state of social observation experience by ingenious superposition. Dreyer, on the other hand, focuses on events, one by one indescribable, and the connected stories are filled with the creator's sympathy. They are deliberately joined together by making the observers feel short-lived adhesions, so as to achieve a single story. a holistic...
-
Bret 2022-04-06 08:01:02
If cinema is the art of light, then Dreyer must be the darling of the art god. If the movie is an untouchable creature, then this movie must be more perfect than the zebra to express the depth of black and white. If religion is a kind of destiny, then Dreyer's ring shot must be the most divine. May God bless Dreyer's soul, because he must have been pious and noble in his life -...
Day of Wrath Comments
-
Donato 2022-04-06 08:01:02
Birth of tragedy
There are many literary and cinematic works about the tragic fate of medieval witches. Precisely the Middle Ages was also the most prosperous period of Christianity, and the power of the church could almost decide everything. It is this kind of arbitrary spirit and power rule that allows the people...
-
Elda 2022-04-06 08:01:02
[Film Review] Day of Wrath (1943) 7.5/10
A 17th century drama about the antediluvian act of witchery persecution and the excruciating human benightedness inflicted by religious indoctrination, Carl Theodor Dreyer's DAY OF WRATH is a sublimely slow-paced threnody that sets to shock and awe.
Prior to Ingmar Bergman's soul-searching felicity...
Top cast
-
Anne Pedersdotter: Absalon, hold me. Hold me and make me happy.
-
Rev. Absalon Pederssøn: I must look into myself. I have much to speak to God about.