I remember that sometimes when I mentioned someone who embarrassed me, someone would jump out and say: Although this person is a silly X, he is actually very kind; even though this person has done something shameless, but in fact he Have done some good deeds; although this person cheated you, he actually helped others.
Well, people are indeed very complicated. In the real world, there is no absolute difference between good people and bad people. There are many movies that implement this concept. For a while, I can only think of "Fire Dragon Showdown". The decent villains have no clear boundaries in morality, and there is no distinction between high and low in human nature. A similar treatment is obviously a good choice for movies, at least it can make the movie a lot more plump, and it can add a mature and real feeling to the movie.
However, I have to admit that after years of "understanding" and comprehensive consideration of people who do bad things to others, I really feel that this kind of self is too forgiving.
In fact, when everyone faces each person, they use their own different aspects to face each other. What you face others is your bad side, and this side of you makes you feel disgusting, then you are very disgusting, so you don't need to worry about how you are in other aspects. If you hurt someone with one aspect of you, you have to use all of you to accept punishment.
The character image and the relationship between the characters in "Harry Brown" are simple and straightforward. The director hardly intends to make any complicated and enriching treatments. The bad guys are completely broken and crisp, and basically do not emphasize the misery in the degraded social atmosphere. The background of survival in shaping and releasing the evil humanity. Although a little mention of Marky’s growth experience gave Marky an image of a poor creature who cannot dominate his life; although there are also characters like Sid who do bad things in private, but live in harmony with others and hide deeply, it seems that Sid is more than ordinary. The so-called "bad guys" also have a hypocritical and dangerous image, and Sid's existence eventually gave the villains a quick death sentence.
The so-called complexity of people, I prefer to believe that it is the complexity of shaping. The process of building and developing civilization for thousands of years is nothing more than a process of building, perfecting, and beautifying "human nature" with impure goals on the basis of his own animal nature. The more developed and advanced civilization is, the more doubtful it is: whether animality appears to be pervasive, and whether humanity appears weak and false—because if humanity is so beautiful, why bother to have so many "civilized" Things to describe or decorate.
Therefore, if others treat you with an animal side, or even hurt you or your partner, the easiest way is to pick up the burden yourself and use your animal side to fight back.
PS I don't feel at all how lengthy the film was before Harry Brown's revenge. Of course, if you treat the movie as purely an action movie or just watch the movie at the last gimmick of the bad old man, then the previous paragraph is indeed lengthy, and it is too long.
In fact, I like the previous paragraph very much, not to mention how much it has to do with the plot, the emotion of the film, and the theme of the film. With that quiet and calm temperament, it is already very good. For example, "The Execution Man" is also a movie I like very much. In comparison, it seems a lot of frivolous-how to say, any practice such as stripping naked will be lack of nutrition because of the lack of prelude. ; In other words, the so-called artistic sense can only be realized with a bit of tweaking.
View more about Harry Brown reviews
