What Judge Sarokin said after his retirement in this case

Mckenzie 2022-04-24 07:01:07

It's a bit similar to In the Name of the Father, but the whole movie is a trickle of water, not too big a wave, but it's still inspiring, hatred put me in prison, and love made me see the sun again. Defending justice is really a positive and touching thing~

Godfrey 2022-04-20 09:01:42

I think the adaptation of real events should not be too fictitious. This is the most basic principle, especially in criminal cases involving serious social phenomena, which should be more cautious and objective. The film director constructed the underlying logic of the whole film based on the words of the parties. In this logic, he beautified the violent male protagonist and vilified a bunch of cyborgs, such as the policeman who kept staring at him and arrested him. It doesn't exist. For example, during his time in prison, there were actually many cypress people who helped him, including many famous people. All these were deleted from the movie. The case itself was not mentioned, and a fierce conflict between the two groups was deliberately created. The whole film is a storytelling with subjective characters. It is close to a 150-minute film. Until about 120 minutes, the talents of the Canadian commune officially start to investigate the case again. Before that, the case itself needs objective evidence, testimony, Absent from being there to prove that these normal investigations have not been mentioned before, it seems that the case can be judged directly after several appeals and losses. . . This method really confuses me, and I suggest that it is more important to reflect on the case.