No video found. Looking at the Douban comments, I found that I can say two more words

Jordan 2022-04-20 09:01:37

Talk show host Oprah was implicated in a lawsuit years ago. She spoke on the show about the potential harm that genetically modified foods can bring to people. But agribusiness companies lobbied the legislators to legislate one step ahead: the crime of slandering food. As a result, oprah was accused, and after several years of lawsuits, she was finally acquitted.
The drunkard's intention is not to drink, it doesn't matter whether oprah wins or loses, the purpose is to shock the mountain, and whoever dares to speak ill of genetically modified food in the future should be careful. There are very few people who can pay a lot of money to hire a lawyer and spend so long to get their innocence. Therefore, ordinary people are eating genetically modified foods without knowing it. You thought it was enough to buy oil and buy non-GMO ones. Do you know what other snacks and pastries are used for? Not all businesses carefully label which crops we use.
al is the host, russel is the insider, talking about the topic of tobacco, don't you think it's a bit old-fashioned that tobacco is harmful? So think of genetically modified food, hee hee.

View more about The Insider reviews

Extended Reading
  • Lee 2022-03-24 09:01:39

    I have always disliked political shady films, because I feel that it seems too Hollywood-style wishful thinking in any case, and if you want to find the truth, then the movie is not a good place. But then again, the filming is quite good: the narrative is stable, the emotional point is reasonable, the director is delicate, and the performance is excellent. It is an excellent Hollywood work. Especially Russell Crowe: Uncle's performance here almost kills the beautiful mind, pay attention to eyes and limbs.

  • Peggie 2022-04-21 09:01:48

    One of the few films in the West that exposes interest groups to produce harmful products that endanger public health safety, does not hesitate to deceive people, crack down on those in the know and those exposed, secretly manipulate news and public opinion, and conspiracy to control social life. It is so difficult to accuse tobacco nicotine of harming smokers. ? Is it true that Jeffrey is the only scientist who is engaged in the harm of tobacco, so that tobacco companies can refute the views and conclusions of his scientific research only by digging up Jeffrey's personal privacy on the news and questioning his personal character and credit. Rebut his scientific conclusion as a scientist that nicotine harms smokers' health? This also estimates that the IQ of the people is too low. The two little girls are so beautiful like little angels.

The Insider quotes

  • Lowell Bergman: I never left a source hang out to dry, ever! Abandoned! Not 'til right fucking now. When I came on this job, I came with my word intact. I'm gonna leave with my word intact. Fuck the rules of the game!

  • Lowell Bergman: I did not burn you. I did not give you up to anyone!

    Jeffrey Wigand: This is my house... In front of my wife, my kids? What business do we have?

    Lowell Bergman: To straighten something out with you. Right here. Right now.

    Jeffrey Wigand: So, you didn't mention my name? You haven't talked to anybody about me?

    Lowell Bergman: Why am I gonna mention your name?

    Jeffrey Wigand: How did Brown & Williamson know I spoke to you...?

    Lowell Bergman: How the hell do I know about Brown & Williamson?

    Jeffrey Wigand: It happened after I talked to you. I do not like coincidences!

    Lowell Bergman: And I don't like paranoid accusations! I'm a journalist. Think. Use your head. How do I operate as a journalist by screwing the people who could provide me with information before they provided me with it?

    Jeffrey Wigand: [pauses] ... You came all the way down here to tell me that?